From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TPM selftest failure in 4.15
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 15:10:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180208131007.wedzl5itrlx2dawn@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1517515204.3145.51.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:00:04PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 11:59 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:46:04PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I honestly don't think we should be waiting for the self test at
> > > all.
> > > We should kick it off and treat any TPM_RC_TESTING error as
> > > -EAGAIN.
> > > We're already under fire for slow boot sequences and adding 2s just
> > > to
> > > wait for the TPM to self test adds to that for no real value.
> >
> > Arguably the BIOS should have completed the selftest - this stuff
> > generally only exists to support embedded.
> >
> > I don't like the idea of EAGAIN, that just expose all our users to
> > this mess.
> >
> > I would support making transmit_cmd genericly wait and retry if the
> > TPM insists we need to wait for selftest to complete the specific
> > command though.
>
> OK, how about this then?
>
> James
As long as there is no identified a regression it is a waste
of time to review these...
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 12:16 TPM selftest failure in 4.15 James Bottomley
2018-02-01 12:21 ` Paul Menzel
2018-02-01 12:42 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-01 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-01 17:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-02-01 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-01 18:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-02-01 20:00 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-01 20:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-02-01 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-08 13:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-02-08 17:02 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-09 10:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-09 10:30 ` Nayna Jain
2018-02-15 12:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-09 11:47 ` Alexander Steffen
2018-02-15 12:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-15 15:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-16 18:30 ` Alexander Steffen
2018-02-19 9:15 ` Nayna Jain
2018-02-19 22:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-02-16 18:27 ` Alexander Steffen
2018-02-20 13:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-09 12:26 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-09 16:23 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-09 21:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-08 18:27 ` Ken Goldman
2018-02-09 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-08 17:27 ` Ken Goldman
2018-02-01 19:16 ` TPM selftest failure in 4.15 (Dell XPS 13, Nuvoton 6xx) Paul Menzel
2018-02-01 19:17 ` Paul Menzel
2018-02-01 20:12 ` Mario.Limonciello
2018-02-01 21:06 ` Mario.Limonciello
2018-02-01 22:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-02-02 5:46 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-02 5:46 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-08 16:53 ` Ken Goldman
2018-02-08 13:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-08 13:05 ` TPM selftest failure in 4.15 Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-08 13:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-08 12:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-08 18:45 ` Ken Goldman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180208131007.wedzl5itrlx2dawn@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox