From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:41855 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751268AbeEDISP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 4 May 2018 04:18:15 -0400
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 11:18:03 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] tpm device not showing up in /dev anymore
Message-ID: <20180504081803.GC6373@linux.intel.com>
References: <20171114145953.m3a343qvgln2z4er@linux.intel.com>
 <1510672631.4078.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <20171117131620.het4yxavz6lco6ow@linux.intel.com>
 <67ca8d8f-bd2c-a1ad-72d1-7f4b8df0a847@debian.org>
 <20180103003355.oaie7tych5lmtxiq@cantor>
 <bea3c5c2-4abe-27bc-3fe0-761457cca897@debian.org>
 <20180214114353.tw72tztmth2agpqu@linux.intel.com>
 <58cd2dfe-24e7-e320-c7ef-153ba5855835@debian.org>
 <d7d5a45fd2479eaf4495adde53391d53ee6d1ca6.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <471775d9-374a-a97b-dacd-a4ca2beb56eb@debian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-Reply-To: <471775d9-374a-a97b-dacd-a4ca2beb56eb@debian.org>
Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:38:17PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le 15/03/18 a 17:24, Jarkko Sakkinen a ecrit :
> > On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 18:24 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > The duration that that was in your patch seems to work, cannot this be
> > > implemented?
> > > 
> > > I'm quite surprised I'm the only one impacted by this...
> > Sorry it took so long time response but I had forgotten so too many
> > details.
> > 
> > After re-reading (PHEW!) the whole thread I'm thinking if we could
> > use section 5.5.2.4 as a reference to select a timeout of TIMEOUT_A
> > (albeit it is for request locality) and use Jerry's suggestion to
> > put wait_for_tpm_stat() there? Opinions?
> Hey,
> 
> Sorry to bother you again, but are there any progress on getting this
> mainlined?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Laurent Bigonville

Sorry for not doing anything. Jerry, do you want to send patch?

/Jarkko