From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, philip.b.tricca@intel.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:10:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619131046.GC5609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152882630662.30206.8805136953394285180.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:58:26AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> The TCG SAPI specification [1] defines a set of functions, which allows
> applications to use the TPM device in either blocking or non-blocking fashion.
> Each command defined by the specification has a corresponding
> Tss2_Sys_<COMMAND>_Prepare() and Tss2_Sys_<COMMAND>_Complete() call, which
> together with Tss2_Sys_ExecuteAsync() is designed to allow asynchronous
> mode of operation. Currently the TPM driver supports only blocking calls,
> which doesn't allow asynchronous IO operations.
> This patch changes it and adds support for nonblocking write and a new poll
> function to enable applications, which want to take advantage of this feature.
> The new functionality can be tested using standard TPM tools implemented
> in [2], together with modified TCTI from [3].
>
> [1] https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TSS_SAPI_Version-1.1_Revision-22_review_030918.pdf
> [2] https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools
> [3] https://github.com/tstruk/tpm2-tss/tree/async
For me the value is still a bit questionable. The benchmark looks a bit
flakky to give much figures how this would work with real world workloads.
I read James response and I also have to question why not just a worker
thread in user space? TPM does only one command at a time anyways.
Cannot take this in before I know that user space will (1) adapt to
this and (2) gain value compared to a worker thread.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-12 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: add ptr to the tpm_space struct to file_priv Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-13 17:55 ` J Freyensee
2018-06-13 18:05 ` Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-19 13:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-06-20 0:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-20 23:59 ` James Bottomley
2018-06-21 1:24 ` Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-21 5:26 ` James Bottomley
2018-06-21 16:20 ` Tadeusz Struk
2018-06-21 17:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-06-21 17:36 ` Tadeusz Struk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180619131046.GC5609@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip.b.tricca@intel.com \
--cc=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox