linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Martin Galvan <omgalvan.86@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about the TPM driver
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 22:16:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180916191605.GB7473@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN19L9EEYK+OpJSCw+nNv7fCjkS5eQeAXfy=51nfk=fBZne-BA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:14:30AM -0300, Martin Galvan wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I noticed that, after a command is done, the TPM driver only allows
> for a single read operation (for a limited time). If I wanted to e.g.
> check a command's response code before attempting to read the rest of
> the response, my next read would fail. Same happens if I take too long
> to read a command's results.
> 
> I can understand the timeout, but I'm curious about this single-read
> policy, especially since some commands such as GetCapability don't
> guarantee how much data will actually be returned. Does anyone know
> why it was implemented this way?
> 
> Thanks

I understand your concerns but without a concrete workload there is no
problem with this behavior.

/Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-17  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-13 13:14 Question about the TPM driver Martin Galvan
2018-09-13 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-13 14:31   ` Martin Galvan
2018-09-13 15:11     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2018-09-13 15:21       ` Tadeusz Struk
2018-09-13 15:26         ` Martin Galvan
2018-10-11 15:17   ` Ken Goldman
2018-09-16 19:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-09-17 13:32   ` Martin Galvan
2018-09-17 14:45     ` James Bottomley
2018-09-17 21:23       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-17 21:20     ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180916191605.GB7473@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omgalvan.86@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).