From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jsnitsel@redhat.com,
peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH REVIEW 2/2] tpm_tis: override durations for STM tpm with firmware 1.2.8.28
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:14:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190103131453.GC10491@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214132115.26223-2-aklimov@redhat.com>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:21:15PM +0000, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> There was revealed a bug in the STM TPM chipset used in Dell R415s.
> Bug is observed so far only on chipset firmware 1.2.8.28
> (1.2 TPM, device-id 0x0, rev-id 78). After some number of
> operations chipset hangs and stays in inconsistent state:
>
> tpm_tis 00:09: Operation Timed out
> tpm_tis 00:09: tpm_transmit: tpm_send: error -5
>
> Durations returned by the chip are the same like on other
> firmware revisions but apparently with specifically 1.2.8.28 fw
> durations should be reset to 2 minutes to enable tpm chip work
> properly. No working way of updating firmware was found.
>
> This patch adds implementation of ->update_durations method
> that matches only STM devices with specific firmware version.
>
> Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index d2345d9fd7b5..e0bdca647460 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,95 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +struct tis_vendor_durations_override {
> + u32 did_vid;
> + struct tpm_version_t tpm_version;
> + unsigned long durs[3];
I would rather have just "unsigned long durations[3];".
> +};
> +
> +static
> +const struct tis_vendor_durations_override vendor_dur_overrides[] = {
> + /* STMicroelectronics 0x104a */
> + { 0x0000104A,
> + { 1, 2, 8, 28 },
> + { (2 * 60 * HZ), (2 * 60 * HZ), (2 * 60 * HZ) } },
> +};
> +
> +static bool tpm_tis_update_durations(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> + unsigned long *duration_cap)
> +{
> + struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> + u32 did_vid;
> + int i, rc;
> + cap_t cap;
> +
> + if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)
> + chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, true);
> +
> + rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_DID_VID(0), &did_vid);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i != ARRAY_SIZE(vendor_dur_overrides); i++) {
> + if (vendor_dur_overrides[i].did_vid != did_vid)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Try to get a TPM version 1.2 TPM_CAP_VERSION_INFO */
> + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2, &cap,
> + "attempting to determine the 1.2 version",
> + sizeof(cap.tpm_version_1_2));
Not properly aligned.
> + if (!rc) {
> + if ((cap.tpm_version_1_2.Major ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.Major) &&
> + (cap.tpm_version_1_2.Minor ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.Minor) &&
> + (cap.tpm_version_1_2.revMajor ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.revMajor) &&
> + (cap.tpm_version_1_2.revMinor ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.revMinor)) {
Same.
> +
> + memcpy(duration_cap,
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].durs,
> + sizeof(vendor_dur_overrides[i].durs));
Same.
> + rc = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + } else {
> + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1, &cap,
> + "attempting to determine the 1.1 version",
> + sizeof(cap.tpm_version));
Same.
> + if (rc) {
> + rc = false;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if ((cap.tpm_version.Major ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.Major) &&
> + (cap.tpm_version.Minor ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.Minor) &&
> + (cap.tpm_version.revMajor ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.revMajor) &&
> + (cap.tpm_version.revMinor ==
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].tpm_version.revMinor)) {
Same.
> +
> + memcpy(duration_cap,
> + vendor_dur_overrides[i].durs,
> + sizeof(vendor_dur_overrides[i].durs));
Same.
> + rc = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rc = false;
Shoud return proper rc instead of bool.
> +
> +out:
> + if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)
> + chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, false);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +
> struct tis_vendor_timeout_override {
> u32 did_vid;
> unsigned long timeout_us[4];
> @@ -847,6 +936,7 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_tis = {
> .send = tpm_tis_send,
> .cancel = tpm_tis_ready,
> .update_timeouts = tpm_tis_update_timeouts,
> + .update_durations = tpm_tis_update_durations,
> .req_complete_mask = TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
> .req_complete_val = TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
> .req_canceled = tpm_tis_req_canceled,
> --
> 2.14.4
>
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-03 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-14 13:21 [PATCH REVIEW 1/2] tpm: provide a way to override the chip returned durations Alexey Klimov
2018-12-14 13:21 ` [PATCH REVIEW 2/2] tpm_tis: override durations for STM tpm with firmware 1.2.8.28 Alexey Klimov
2019-01-03 13:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-01-14 19:39 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-01-18 14:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-20 21:30 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-01-21 12:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 13:05 ` [PATCH REVIEW 1/2] tpm: provide a way to override the chip returned durations Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190103131453.GC10491@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aklimov@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).