linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] tpm: don't return bool from update_timeouts
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:41:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190129174145.1482-2-jsnitsel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129174145.1482-1-jsnitsel@redhat.com>

Set tpm_chip->timeouts_adjusted directly in the update_timeouts
code instead of returning bool. Return rc of tpm read instead,
which can be return an error in the case of the spi driver.

Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c     | 3 +--
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 8 ++++----
 include/linux/tpm.h             | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c
index 6f306338953b..bda9a16b44f6 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm1-cmd.c
@@ -380,8 +380,7 @@ int tpm1_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 	 * of misreporting.
 	 */
 	if (chip->ops->update_timeouts)
-		chip->timeout_adjusted =
-			chip->ops->update_timeouts(chip, timeout_eff);
+		chip->ops->update_timeouts(chip, timeout_eff);
 
 	if (!chip->timeout_adjusted) {
 		/* Restore default if chip reported 0 */
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index bf7e49cfa643..57c5b6712563 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -521,13 +521,15 @@ static const struct tis_vendor_timeout_override vendor_timeout_overrides[] = {
 			(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT*1000), (TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT*1000) } },
 };
 
-static bool tpm_tis_update_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip,
+static int tpm_tis_update_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip,
 				    unsigned long *timeout_cap)
 {
 	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
 	int i, rc;
 	u32 did_vid;
 
+	chip->timeout_adjusted = false;
+
 	if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)
 		chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, true);
 
@@ -540,11 +542,9 @@ static bool tpm_tis_update_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip,
 			continue;
 		memcpy(timeout_cap, vendor_timeout_overrides[i].timeout_us,
 		       sizeof(vendor_timeout_overrides[i].timeout_us));
-		rc = true;
+		chip->timeout_adjusted = true;
 	}
 
-	rc = false;
-
 out:
 	if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)
 		chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, false);
diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
index b49a55cf775f..d18df4b6247f 100644
--- a/include/linux/tpm.h
+++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct tpm_class_ops {
 	int (*send) (struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len);
 	void (*cancel) (struct tpm_chip *chip);
 	u8 (*status) (struct tpm_chip *chip);
-	bool (*update_timeouts)(struct tpm_chip *chip,
+	int (*update_timeouts)(struct tpm_chip *chip,
 				unsigned long *timeout_cap);
 	int (*go_idle)(struct tpm_chip *chip);
 	int (*cmd_ready)(struct tpm_chip *chip);
-- 
2.20.1.98.gecbdaf0899


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-29 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-29 17:41 [RFC PATCH 0/1] tpm: don't return bool from update_timeouts Jerry Snitselaar
2019-01-29 17:41 ` Jerry Snitselaar [this message]
2019-01-29 19:22   ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-29 19:50     ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-01-29 21:12       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-29 18:31 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-29 20:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] " Jerry Snitselaar
2019-01-30 21:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-30 21:24     ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190129174145.1482-2-jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --to=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).