From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFCAC31E4B for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5011821721 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728473AbfFNOqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:46:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44024 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728323AbfFNOqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:46:17 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A7AF99; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:46:12 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Ignaz Forster Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ima: Add overlay test + doc Message-ID: <20190614144611.GA869@dell5510> Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20190613161414.29161-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20190613161414.29161-5-pvorel@suse.cz> <55f6fec4-ef01-db2b-62c0-cbbbf79c6c12@suse.de> <20190614141449.GA24614@dell5510> <794ee977-463f-6670-fac6-3e27e25d64ab@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <794ee977-463f-6670-fac6-3e27e25d64ab@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Hi Ignaz, > > > This test requires "appraise_tcb" ("tcb" is not enough), as the errors only > > > occur during appraisal. > > Are you sure? This is a note for ima_measurements.sh test (not for evm_overlay.sh). > > I require ima_policy=tcb here, according to Mimi [1] > Oh, sorry, you are correct - "tcb" is correct in this case. I got confused > as the documentation is included in the overlayfs reproducer patch. Maybe I should put it into separate commit. > Ignaz Kind regards, Petr