From: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima_evm_utils: erroneous "verification failed: 0 (invalid padding)" message
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:37:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190716213724.bay6dt5sjwdpucmb@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1563287417-31780-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Mimi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:30:16AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> When keys are not provided, the default key is used to verify the file
> signature, resulting in this erroneous message. Before using the default
> key to verify the file signature, verify the keyid is correct.
1. What is default key when keys are not provided?
2. I don't see keyid verification in the patch.
3. Now we have so complicated keyfile handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> src/libimaevm.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/libimaevm.c b/src/libimaevm.c
> index ae487f9fe36c..472ab53c7b42 100644
> --- a/src/libimaevm.c
> +++ b/src/libimaevm.c
> @@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ EVP_PKEY *read_pub_pkey(const char *keyfile, int x509)
> X509 *crt = NULL;
> EVP_PKEY *pkey = NULL;
>
> + if (!keyfile)
> + return NULL;
> +
> fp = fopen(keyfile, "r");
> if (!fp) {
> log_err("Failed to open keyfile: %s\n", keyfile);
> @@ -569,27 +572,25 @@ static int get_hash_algo_from_sig(unsigned char *sig)
> int verify_hash(const char *file, const unsigned char *hash, int size, unsigned char *sig,
> int siglen)
> {
> - const char *key;
> - int x509;
> + const char *key = NULL;
> verify_hash_fn_t verify_hash;
>
> /* Get signature type from sig header */
> if (sig[0] == DIGSIG_VERSION_1) {
> verify_hash = verify_hash_v1;
> +
> /* Read pubkey from RSA key */
> - x509 = 0;
> + if (!params.keyfile)
> + key = "/etc/keys/pubkey_evm.pem";
> } else if (sig[0] == DIGSIG_VERSION_2) {
> verify_hash = verify_hash_v2;
> +
> /* Read pubkey from x509 cert */
> - x509 = 1;
> + if (!params.keyfile)
> + init_public_keys("/etc/keys/x509_evm.der");
Also, in "ima-evm-utils: Preload public keys for ima_verify" I call
init_public_keys in cmd_verify_ima() which calls this verify_hash().
So there will be double calling of init_public_keys().
ps. Btw, I think we should remove this verify_hash_fn_t indirect call
trick and replace it with two normal calls in each if branch.
verify_hash() calling verify_hash() obscures cscope, and with direct
calls it will be easier to parse. I may send patch for this.
Thanks,
> } else
> return -1;
>
> - /* Determine what key to use for verification*/
> - key = params.keyfile ? : x509 ?
> - "/etc/keys/x509_evm.der" :
> - "/etc/keys/pubkey_evm.pem";
> -
> return verify_hash(file, hash, size, sig, siglen, key);
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-16 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-16 14:30 [PATCH 1/2] ima_evm_utils: erroneous "verification failed: 0 (invalid padding)" message Mimi Zohar
2019-07-16 14:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] ima_evm_utils: limit duplicate "Failed to open keyfile" messages Mimi Zohar
2019-07-16 21:49 ` Vitaly Chikunov
2019-07-16 22:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-07-17 13:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-07-16 21:37 ` Vitaly Chikunov [this message]
2019-07-16 21:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] ima_evm_utils: erroneous "verification failed: 0 (invalid padding)" message Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190716213724.bay6dt5sjwdpucmb@altlinux.org \
--to=vt@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).