linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrey Pronin <apronin@chromium.org>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, groeck@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: avoid accessing cleared ops during shutdown
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:40:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710114000.GD2614@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710002209.6757-1-apronin@chromium.org>

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 05:22:09PM -0700, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> This patch prevents NULL dereferencing when using chip->ops while
> sending TPM2_Shutdown command if both tpm_class_shutdown handler and
> tpm_del_char_device are called during system shutdown.
> 
> Both these handlers set chip->ops to NULL but don't check if it's
> already NULL when they are called before using it.
> 
> This issue was revealed in Chrome OS after a recent set of changes
> to the unregister order for spi controllers, such as:
>   b4c6230bb0ba spi: Fix controller unregister order
>   f40913d2dca1 spi: pxa2xx: Fix controller unregister order
> and similar for other controllers.

I'm not sure I fully understand the scenario. When does thi happen?
Why does not tpm_del_char_device need this? The changes listed tell
me nothing. Why they have this effect?

I'm just trying to understand whether this could be a regression or
not.

I neither understand what you mean by "and similar for other
controllers."

NAK for the reason that I don't understand what I'm merging.

/Jarkko

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Pronin <apronin@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 8c77e88012e9..a410ca40a3c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int tpm_class_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(dev, struct tpm_chip, dev);
>  
>  	down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> -	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> +	if (chip->ops && (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) {
>  		if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) {
>  			tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
>  			tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  
>  	/* Make the driver uncallable. */
>  	down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> -	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> +	if (chip->ops && (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) {
>  		if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) {
>  			tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
>  			tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-10 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-10  0:22 [PATCH] tpm: avoid accessing cleared ops during shutdown Andrey Pronin
2020-07-10 11:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-07-10 18:25   ` Andrey Pronin
2020-07-14 11:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-14 15:48       ` Guenter Roeck
2020-07-16 17:28         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-16 17:38           ` Guenter Roeck
2020-07-23  1:56             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-10 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-10 20:34   ` Andrey Pronin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200710114000.GD2614@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=apronin@chromium.org \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).