From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tpm_tis: Clean up locality release
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:26:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930022606.GH808399@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929223216.22584-2-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:13PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> The current release locality code seems to be based on the
> misunderstanding that the TPM interrupts when a locality is released:
> it doesn't, only when the locality is acquired.
>
> Furthermore, there seems to be no point in waiting for the locality to
> be released. All it does is penalize the last TPM user. However, if
> there's no next TPM user, this is a pointless wait and if there is a
> next TPM user, they'll pay the penalty waiting for the new locality
> (or possibly not if it's the same as the old locality).
>
> Fix the code by making release_locality as simple write to release
> with no waiting for completion.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Adding Jerry for feedback.
Probably should have (if accepted).
Fixes: 33bafe90824b ("tpm_tis: verify locality released before returning from release_locality")
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 47 +--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 92c51c6cfd1b..a9fa40714c64 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -134,58 +134,13 @@ static bool check_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool locality_inactive(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
> -{
> - struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> - int rc;
> - u8 access;
> -
> - rc = tpm_tis_read8(priv, TPM_ACCESS(l), &access);
> - if (rc < 0)
> - return false;
> -
> - if ((access & (TPM_ACCESS_VALID | TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY))
> - == TPM_ACCESS_VALID)
> - return true;
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static int release_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
Should be void.
> {
> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> - unsigned long stop, timeout;
> - long rc;
>
> tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_ACCESS(l), TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY);
>
> - stop = jiffies + chip->timeout_a;
> -
> - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
> -again:
> - timeout = stop - jiffies;
> - if ((long)timeout <= 0)
> - return -1;
> -
> - rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(priv->int_queue,
> - (locality_inactive(chip, l)),
> - timeout);
> -
> - if (rc > 0)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS && freezing(current)) {
> - clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
> - goto again;
> - }
> - } else {
> - do {
> - if (locality_inactive(chip, l))
> - return 0;
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> - } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> - }
> - return -1;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 22:32 [PATCH 0/4] tpm_tis: fix interrupts (again) James Bottomley
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] tpm_tis: Clean up locality release James Bottomley
2020-09-30 2:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-09-30 2:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 21:19 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-09-30 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01 0:01 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-01 15:58 ` James Bottomley
2021-01-02 1:17 ` Laurent Bigonville
2020-10-01 2:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-01 4:49 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01 17:48 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] tpm_tis: Fix interrupts for TIS TPMs without legacy cycles James Bottomley
2020-09-30 2:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] tpm_tis: fix IRQ probing James Bottomley
2020-09-30 2:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] Revert "tpm: Revert "tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's"" James Bottomley
2020-09-30 2:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930022606.GH808399@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).