linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] tpm_tis: fix IRQ probing
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:07:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106220733.GC55146@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e5806c2b12a75f51643599dd388a2b587839ecb.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:21:44AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 17:32 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 03:17:18PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 04:41:35PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > > James Bottomley @ 2020-10-01 11:09 MST:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > There are two problems with our current interrupt probing:
> > > > > > firstly the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ never gets set initially, so a
> > > > > > check for interrupts is never done.  Fix this by setting the
> > > > > > flag before we generate and interrupt for probing.  Secondly
> > > > > > our IRQ setup may be ineffective on a TPM without legacy
> > > > > > access cycles becuase according to the TPM Interface
> > > > > > Specification the interrupt registers are only
> > > > > > writeable in the current locality, so issue a
> > > > > > request_locality before setting up the interrupts.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <
> > > > > > James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > v2: improved description
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > > index 0c07da8cd680..12b657ed3a39 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > > @@ -809,6 +809,19 @@ static int
> > > > > > tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > >  	priv->irq = irq;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > +	/*
> > > > > > +	 * note writes to the interrupt registers are only
> > > > > > effective
> > > > > > +	 * when the TPM is in the active locality, so we have
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > +	 * request the locality here to get the interrupt set
> > > > > > up.
> > > > > > +	 * This request has no corresponding release, because
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > +	 * locality will be relinquished at the end of the tpm
> > > > > > command
> > > > > > +	 * that probes the interrupts
> > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > > +	if (request_locality(chip, 0) != 0) {
> > > > > > +		dev_err(&chip->dev, "failed to gain locality
> > > > > > for irq probe\n");
> > > > > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > 
> > > > Appreciate the comment a lot, but s/note/Note/
> > > 
> > > I tested this with:
> > > 
> > > - 
> > > https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/84861/intel-nuc-kit-nuc5i5myhe.html
> > >   dTPM 1.2
> > > - 
> > > https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/74483/intel-nuc-kit-dc53427hye.html
> > >   dTPM 2.0
> > > 
> > > I did not get "TPM interrupt not working, polling instead" to klog.
> > > But I neither see tpm0 in /proc/interrupts. What I'm doing wrong?
> > 
> > With dTPM2 NUC, I ended up get this when I just pass 'irq=0' to
> > tpm_tis_core_init():
> > 
> > [    0.584421] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1A, rev-id
> > 16)
> > [    0.680417] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 7. 00000008 (tpm0) vs.
> > 00040088 (INT3432:00)
> > [    0.680448] tpm tpm0: Unable to request irq: 7 for probe
> > [    0.704416] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 9. 00000000 (tpm0) vs.
> > 00000080 (acpi)
> > [    0.704444] tpm tpm0: Unable to request irq: 9 for probe
> 
> Well this looks normal: you forced the tis subsystem to probe for an
> IRQ even though ACPI says there isn't one and it didn't find one ... so
> ACPI was actually right (for once).
> 
> James

True. I wanted to give quick feedback with the results, did not have
time to analyze at that point. Can you do one more round with remarks
fixed that I mentioned (if I recall right they were only about comments
and commit messages, code itself is in great condition), and you can add
my tested-by to each commit?

I'll put this then to my next rc request so that we get this to 5.10.

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 18:09 [PATCH v2 0/5] tpm_tis: fix interrupts (again) James Bottomley
2020-10-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tpm_tis: Fix check_locality for correct locality acquisition James Bottomley
2020-10-05 15:34   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 19:00     ` James Bottomley
2020-10-05 20:32       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 23:16   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-24 12:07     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 12:13       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tpm_tis: Clean up locality release James Bottomley
2020-10-05 17:02   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 19:05     ` James Bottomley
2020-10-05 20:34       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 17:03   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 23:17   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-24 12:10     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 12:17       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 15:47         ` James Bottomley
2020-10-30 21:52           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tpm_tis: Fix interrupts for TIS TPMs without legacy cycles James Bottomley
2020-10-05 17:05   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-20  0:14   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-24 12:15     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 12:18       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 16:06         ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-03  4:16           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-01 18:12   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-12-01 19:49     ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-12-01 21:06       ` James Bottomley
2020-12-01 21:47         ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tpm_tis: fix IRQ probing James Bottomley
2020-10-05 17:05   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 23:41   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-24 12:17     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 12:43       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-30 15:49         ` James Bottomley
2020-10-30 16:11           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-03  4:43             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-03 23:00               ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-11-04  0:31                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-03  4:17           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-06 15:32         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-06 16:21           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-06 22:07             ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-10-01 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Revert "tpm: Revert "tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's"" James Bottomley
2020-10-19 20:23   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-19 22:54     ` James Bottomley
2020-10-19 23:40   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-12  5:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] tpm_tis: fix interrupts (again) Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-13  1:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-18  5:34     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-13  1:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-13 15:15   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-13 15:24     ` James Bottomley
2020-10-13 16:05       ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-14 15:03         ` Hans de Goede
2020-10-14 15:23           ` James Bottomley
2020-10-14 16:04             ` Hans de Goede
2020-10-14 16:34               ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-14 16:46                 ` Hans de Goede
2020-10-14 17:01                   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-14 17:04                     ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-14 20:58                   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-15  7:38                     ` Hans de Goede
2020-10-18 21:09                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-15 15:36                     ` James Bottomley
2020-10-15 18:48                       ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-15 18:57                         ` James Bottomley
2020-10-15 19:16                           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-14 16:49                 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-18 21:05     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-20 23:10       ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-24 12:20         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-26 18:29           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-27 17:14             ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201106220733.GC55146@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).