From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Lukasz Majczak <lma@semihalf.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@semihalf.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>, Alex Levin <levinale@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Add missing start/stop_tpm_chip calls
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:18:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125171846.GA31929@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210123014247.989368-1-lma@semihalf.com>
Hi Lukasz,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 02:42:47AM +0100, Lukasz Majczak wrote:
> There is a missing call to start_tpm_chip before the call to
> the tpm_get_timeouts() and tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(). As the current
> approach maight work for tpm2, it fails for tpm1.x - in that case
> call to tpm_get_timeouts() or tpm_tis_probe_irq_single() tries to
> transmit TPM commands on a disabled chip what what doesn't succeed
s/what what/what/
> and in turn causes tpm_tis_core_init() to fail.
> Tested on Samsung Chromebook Pro (Caroline).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majczak <lma@semihalf.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 92c51c6cfd1b..ff0e5fe46a9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -1063,12 +1063,16 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
> init_waitqueue_head(&priv->read_queue);
> init_waitqueue_head(&priv->int_queue);
> if (irq != -1) {
> + rc = tpm_chip_start(chip);
Unless I am missing something, the underlying problem seems to be
the calls to tpm1_getcap(). From other code calling this function,
it looks like it may only require tpm_clk_enable() to work.
With that in mind, would it possibly be better to call tpm_clk_enable()
and tpm_clk_disable() around the calls to tpm1_getcap(), ie in
tpm1_get_timeouts() and in tpm_tis_gen_interrupt() ?
This would avoid the unnecessary calls to tpm_chip_start() and
tpm_chip_stop() for tpm2 chips.
Thanks,
Guenter
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_err;
> /* Before doing irq testing issue a command to the TPM in polling mode
> * to make sure it works. May as well use that command to set the
> * proper timeouts for the driver.
> */
> if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n");
> + tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> rc = -ENODEV;
> goto out_err;
> }
> @@ -1085,6 +1089,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
> } else {
> tpm_tis_probe_irq(chip, intmask);
> }
> + tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> }
>
> rc = tpm_chip_register(chip);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-23 1:42 [PATCH] tpm_tis: Add missing start/stop_tpm_chip calls Lukasz Majczak
2021-01-25 17:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-25 17:18 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-01-26 15:46 ` Łukasz Majczak
2021-01-26 16:46 ` James Bottomley
2021-01-26 18:55 ` Tj (Elloe Linux)
2021-01-28 5:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-29 22:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-29 23:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-30 23:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-31 0:41 ` James Bottomley
2021-01-31 3:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-31 4:18 ` James Bottomley
2021-02-02 16:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 15:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-29 22:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-29 23:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-28 13:07 ` [PATCH v2] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality calls Lukasz Majczak
2021-01-28 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-30 20:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-30 20:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <ghwnvtwifq.fsf@gouders.net>
2021-02-02 16:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 15:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Lukasz Majczak
2021-02-02 16:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-02 22:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 18:47 ` Dirk Gouders
2021-02-03 11:46 ` Dirk Gouders
2021-02-03 13:43 ` Lukasz Majczak
2021-02-03 23:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 19:57 ` [PATCH v4] " Lukasz Majczak
2021-02-02 21:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-02 21:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-03 0:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210125171846.GA31929@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=levinale@google.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lma@semihalf.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=rad@semihalf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).