Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: ibmvtpm: Rename tpm_process_cmd to tpm_status and define flag

Stefan Berger
2021-08-06T12:09:32Z

On 8/6/21 7:25 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 05:52:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Rename the field tpm_processing_cmd to tpm_status in ibmvtpm_dev and set
>> the TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag while the vTPM is busy processing a command.
>>
>> Fixes: 6674ff145eef ("tpm_ibmvtpm: properly handle interrupted packet receptions")
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
> Please put the bug fix first because otherwise it will be dependent of this
> patch, which is bad thing when it comes to backporting.

Yes, and that's why I have this one here also with a Fix tag. I
basically don't want to logically '&' with the 'true' flag but want this
TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag first.

Stefan

>
> /Jarkko