Linux Integrity Measurement development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: THOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr>
To: "zohar@linux.ibm.com" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: THOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr>,
	"syzbot+e8bafe7b82c739eaf153@syzkaller.appspotmail.com" 
	<syzbot+e8bafe7b82c739eaf153@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] IMA: set a default value for unknown digsig algorithms
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:18:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210820121847.34087-1-Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr> (raw)

When adding new protections against writing invalid data in
the security.ima xattr, I erroneously expected ima_get_hash_algo()
to always return a valid 'enum hash_algo', but it turns out it trusts
the user-supplied digital signatures and return it without any checks.
It didn't affect process_measurement() because that function
(indirectly) calls into ima_alloc_atfm() that fallback silently
on the default hash algorithm, but it did affect ima_inode_setxattr
as that new function didn't perform a bounds check.

Update ima_get_hash_algo() to always return a valid hash algorithm,
defaulting on 'ima_hash_algo' when the user-supplied value inside
the xattr is invalid.

This patch was successfully tested by syszbot, see
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8bafe7b82c739eaf153.

Signed-off-by: THOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr>
Reported-by: syzbot+e8bafe7b82c739eaf153@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 8f1eb7ef041e..dbba51583e7c 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ enum hash_algo ima_get_hash_algo(const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value,
 	switch (xattr_value->type) {
 	case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG:
 		sig = (typeof(sig))xattr_value;
-		if (sig->version != 2 || xattr_len <= sizeof(*sig))
+		if (sig->version != 2 || xattr_len <= sizeof(*sig)
+		    || sig->hash_algo >= HASH_ALGO__LAST)
 			return ima_hash_algo;
 		return sig->hash_algo;
 		break;
-- 
2.31.1

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-20 12:18 THOBY Simon [this message]
2021-08-20 15:31 ` [PATCH] IMA: set a default value for unknown digsig algorithms Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-08-20 20:40 ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210820121847.34087-1-Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr \
    --to=simon.thoby@viveris.fr \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+e8bafe7b82c739eaf153@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox