From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Double-check to avoid buffer overflow
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:39:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220118193931.GH8034@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez00FFW-n_Pi=+ya1xY5QuB3q2mPr8++scVe3h3ROeF_mg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 08:32:43PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:37 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> > When building with -Warray-bounds, this warning was emitted:
> >
> > In function 'memset',
> > inlined from 'vtpm_proxy_fops_read' at drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c:102:2:
> > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:43:33: warning: '__builtin_memset' pointer overflow between offset 164 and size [2147483648, 4294967295]
> > [-Warray-bounds]
> > 43 | #define __underlying_memset __builtin_memset
> > | ^
>
> Can you explain what that compiler warning actually means, and which
> compiler it is from? Is this from a 32-bit or a 64-bit architecture?
>
> It sounds like the compiler (GCC?) is hallucinating a codepath on
> which "len" is guaranteed to be >=2147483648, right? Why is it doing
> that? Is this some kinda side effect from the fortify code?
I agree, this looks bogus, or at least the commit message neeeds alot
more explaining.
static int vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
if (count > sizeof(proxy_dev->buffer))
[...]
proxy_dev->req_len = count;
Not clear how req_len can be larger than sizeof(buffer)?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 18:36 [PATCH v2] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Double-check to avoid buffer overflow Kees Cook
2022-01-18 19:32 ` Jann Horn
2022-01-18 19:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-01-18 21:20 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-18 23:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-19 0:42 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220118193931.GH8034@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).