* [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM drivers
@ 2023-04-26 18:58 Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <ZEnWykDF6kbZ8nVi@xpf.sh.intel.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2023-04-26 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-integrity, Peter Huewe, Jarkko Sakkinen, Jason Gunthorpe,
Lino Sanfilippo
Cc: linux-kernel, Pengfei Xu
TPM chip bootstrapping was removed from tpm_chip_register(), and it
was relocated to tpm_tis_core. This breaks all drivers which are not
based on tpm_tis because the chip will not get properly initialized.
Take the corrective steps:
1. Rename tpm_chip_startup() as tpm_chip_bootstrap() and make it one-shot.
2. Call tpm_chip_bootstrap() in tpm_chip_register(), which reverts the
things as tehy used to be.
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZEjqhwHWBnxcaRV5@xpf.sh.intel.com/
Fixes: 548eb516ec0f ("tpm, tpm_tis: startup chip before testing for interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 2 +-
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 2 +-
include/linux/tpm.h | 13 +++++++------
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index 6fdfa65a00c3..b8a484b4ff7a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -606,13 +606,19 @@ static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
}
/*
- * tpm_chip_startup() - performs auto startup and allocates the PCRs
+ * tpm_chip_bootstrap() - Boostrap TPM chip after power on
* @chip: TPM chip to use.
+ *
+ * Initialize TPM chip after power on. This a one-shot function: subsequent
+ * calls will have no effect.
*/
-int tpm_chip_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+int tpm_chip_bootstrap(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
int rc;
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_BOOTSTRAP)
+ return 0;
+
rc = tpm_chip_start(chip);
if (rc)
return rc;
@@ -625,9 +631,15 @@ int tpm_chip_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
stop:
tpm_chip_stop(chip);
+ /*
+ * Unconditionally set, as driver initialization should cease, when the
+ * boostrapping process fails.
+ */
+ chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_BOOTSTRAP;
+
return rc;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_startup);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_bootstrap);
/*
* tpm_chip_register() - create a character device for the TPM chip
@@ -644,6 +656,10 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
int rc;
+ rc = tpm_chip_bootstrap(chip);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip);
tpm_bios_log_setup(chip);
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
index 88d3bd76e076..f6c99b3f0045 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static inline void tpm_msleep(unsigned int delay_msec)
delay_msec * 1000);
};
-int tpm_chip_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip);
+int tpm_chip_bootstrap(struct tpm_chip *chip);
int tpm_chip_start(struct tpm_chip *chip);
void tpm_chip_stop(struct tpm_chip *chip);
struct tpm_chip *tpm_find_get_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip);
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index c2421162cf34..02945d53fcef 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
init_waitqueue_head(&priv->read_queue);
init_waitqueue_head(&priv->int_queue);
- rc = tpm_chip_startup(chip);
+ rc = tpm_chip_bootstrap(chip);
if (rc)
goto out_err;
diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
index 4dc97b9f65fb..50bcdee19b12 100644
--- a/include/linux/tpm.h
+++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
@@ -274,13 +274,14 @@ enum tpm2_cc_attrs {
#define TPM_VID_ATML 0x1114
enum tpm_chip_flags {
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 = BIT(1),
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ = BIT(2),
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL = BIT(3),
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS = BIT(4),
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_ALWAYS_POWERED = BIT(5),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 = BIT(1),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ = BIT(2),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL = BIT(3),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS = BIT(4),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_ALWAYS_POWERED = BIT(5),
TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_POWER_MANAGED = BIT(6),
- TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_UPGRADE = BIT(7),
+ TPM_CHIP_FLAG_BOOTSTRAP = BIT(8),
};
#define to_tpm_chip(d) container_of(d, struct tpm_chip, dev)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <ZEnWykDF6kbZ8nVi@xpf.sh.intel.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM drivers [not found] ` <ZEnWykDF6kbZ8nVi@xpf.sh.intel.com> @ 2023-04-27 10:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2023-04-27 11:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2023-04-27 15:33 ` Lino Sanfilippo 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2023-04-27 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pengfei Xu Cc: linux-integrity, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Lino Sanfilippo, linux-kernel, heng.su On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:58 +0800, Pengfei Xu wrote: > On 2023-04-26 at 21:58:33 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > TPM chip bootstrapping was removed from tpm_chip_register(), and it > > was relocated to tpm_tis_core. This breaks all drivers which are not > > based on tpm_tis because the chip will not get properly initialized. > > > > Take the corrective steps: > > 1. Rename tpm_chip_startup() as tpm_chip_bootstrap() and make it one-shot. > > 2. Call tpm_chip_bootstrap() in tpm_chip_register(), which reverts the > > things as tehy used to be. > ^ two space and one typo "they" > Thanks for your fixed patch in short time! > > And I tested this patch, it could not be reproduced in 155s, and the patch > fixed this issue. > Fixed dmesg is in attached. > > Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> Thanks a lot! I'll take immediate action to send PR to Linus. Lino: no worries. It was expected that such a large refactorization could break a thing or two. You did a good job in any case. BR, Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM drivers 2023-04-27 10:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2023-04-27 11:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2023-04-27 15:33 ` Lino Sanfilippo 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2023-04-27 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pengfei Xu Cc: linux-integrity, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Lino Sanfilippo, linux-kernel, heng.su On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 13:52 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:58 +0800, Pengfei Xu wrote: > > On 2023-04-26 at 21:58:33 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > TPM chip bootstrapping was removed from tpm_chip_register(), and it > > > was relocated to tpm_tis_core. This breaks all drivers which are not > > > based on tpm_tis because the chip will not get properly initialized. > > > > > > Take the corrective steps: > > > 1. Rename tpm_chip_startup() as tpm_chip_bootstrap() and make it one-shot. > > > 2. Call tpm_chip_bootstrap() in tpm_chip_register(), which reverts the > > > things as tehy used to be. > > ^ two space and one typo "they" > > Thanks for your fixed patch in short time! > > > > And I tested this patch, it could not be reproduced in 155s, and the patch > > fixed this issue. > > Fixed dmesg is in attached. > > > > Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> > > Thanks a lot! I'll take immediate action to send PR to Linus. > > Lino: no worries. It was expected that such a large refactorization > could break a thing or two. You did a good job in any case. Done: https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/4/27/297 BR, Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM drivers 2023-04-27 10:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2023-04-27 11:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2023-04-27 15:33 ` Lino Sanfilippo 2023-04-27 17:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Lino Sanfilippo @ 2023-04-27 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen, Pengfei Xu Cc: linux-integrity, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, heng.su Hi Jarkko, On 27.04.23 12:52, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > ATTENTION: This e-mail is from an external sender. Please check attachments and links before opening e.g. with mouseover. > > > On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:58 +0800, Pengfei Xu wrote: >> On 2023-04-26 at 21:58:33 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> TPM chip bootstrapping was removed from tpm_chip_register(), and it >>> was relocated to tpm_tis_core. This breaks all drivers which are not >>> based on tpm_tis because the chip will not get properly initialized. >>> >>> Take the corrective steps: >>> 1. Rename tpm_chip_startup() as tpm_chip_bootstrap() and make it one-shot. >>> 2. Call tpm_chip_bootstrap() in tpm_chip_register(), which reverts the >>> things as tehy used to be. >> ^ two space and one typo "they" >> Thanks for your fixed patch in short time! >> >> And I tested this patch, it could not be reproduced in 155s, and the patch >> fixed this issue. >> Fixed dmesg is in attached. >> >> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> > > Thanks a lot! I'll take immediate action to send PR to Linus. > > Lino: no worries. It was expected that such a large refactorization > could break a thing or two. You did a good job in any case. > > BR, Jarkko I guess you are right, there will probably be more issues showing up in the next time. I will try my best to help fixing them. Thank you very much (also for fixing this issue)! Best regards, Lino ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM drivers 2023-04-27 15:33 ` Lino Sanfilippo @ 2023-04-27 17:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2023-04-27 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lino Sanfilippo, Pengfei Xu Cc: linux-integrity, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, heng.su On Thu Apr 27, 2023 at 6:33 PM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote: > > Hi Jarkko, > > On 27.04.23 12:52, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > ATTENTION: This e-mail is from an external sender. Please check attachments and links before opening e.g. with mouseover. > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 09:58 +0800, Pengfei Xu wrote: > >> On 2023-04-26 at 21:58:33 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >>> TPM chip bootstrapping was removed from tpm_chip_register(), and it > >>> was relocated to tpm_tis_core. This breaks all drivers which are not > >>> based on tpm_tis because the chip will not get properly initialized. > >>> > >>> Take the corrective steps: > >>> 1. Rename tpm_chip_startup() as tpm_chip_bootstrap() and make it one-shot. > >>> 2. Call tpm_chip_bootstrap() in tpm_chip_register(), which reverts the > >>> things as tehy used to be. > >> ^ two space and one typo "they" > >> Thanks for your fixed patch in short time! > >> > >> And I tested this patch, it could not be reproduced in 155s, and the patch > >> fixed this issue. > >> Fixed dmesg is in attached. > >> > >> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> > > > > Thanks a lot! I'll take immediate action to send PR to Linus. > > > > Lino: no worries. It was expected that such a large refactorization > > could break a thing or two. You did a good job in any case. > > > > BR, Jarkko > > I guess you are right, there will probably be more issues showing up > in the next time. I will try my best to help fixing them. > Thank you very much (also for fixing this issue)! Yeah, no worries, that is my responsibility in the end to take care of whatever I accept :-) And yeah, this was complicated change to do, I think you did your best and that is good enough as far as I'm concerned. BR, Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-27 17:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-26 18:58 [PATCH] tpm: Re-enable TPM chip boostrapping non-tpm_tis TPM drivers Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <ZEnWykDF6kbZ8nVi@xpf.sh.intel.com>
2023-04-27 10:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-27 11:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-27 15:33 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2023-04-27 17:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox