public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] s390/ipl: fix virtual vs physical address confusion
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:44:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230816154419.29011-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816132942.2540411-1-agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 03:29:42PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> The value of ipl_cert_list_addr boot variable contains
> a physical address, which is used directly. That works
> because virtual and physical address spaces are currently
> the same, but otherwise it is wrong.
> 
> While at it, fix also a comment for the platform keyring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c             | 4 ++--
>  arch/s390/kernel/setup.c                          | 2 +-
>  security/integrity/platform_certs/load_ipl_s390.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Mimi, Jarkko, any objections from your side?
I would take this via the s390 tree.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-16 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 13:29 [PATCH v2] s390/ipl: fix virtual vs physical address confusion Alexander Gordeev
2023-08-16 15:44 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2023-08-16 17:34   ` Mimi Zohar
2023-08-16 19:32   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-16 16:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-08-16 17:07   ` Alexander Gordeev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230816154419.29011-A-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox