Linux Integrity Measurement development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ima_violations.sh: Update validate() to support multiple violations
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:43:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304174342.GA97130@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54cf5311ec5e0debd6dfd63669e8d01883c0ba23.camel@linux.ibm.com>

> On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 09:44 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 14:31 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi Mimi,

> > > > Add support for the number of expected violations.  Include the
> > > > expected number of violations in the output.

> > > Unfortunately this works only on fixed kernel (e.g. the one with v1 of your
> > > "ima: limit both open-writers and ToMToU violations" kernel patchset [1]
> > > (I haven't built v2 [2], but it's really just
> > > s/IMA_LIMIT_VIOLATIONS/IMA_EMITTED_OPENWRITERS/ => it will work)

> > > Testing on any other kernel it fails on first testing after reboot:

> > Hi Petr,

> > I only tested by specifying the "ima_policy=tcb" on the boot command line.  This
> > failure happens when loading the test specific policy rules.  If setup() is
> > called before loading the test specific policy rules, forcing the $LOG file
> > violation at setup() would be too early.

> Sorry, that doesn't seem to be the case.

> With the changes to validate(), even the original tests will only work on a new
> kernel.  I'll rework the patch set, so at least the original tests will continue
> to work.

+1, thank you!

Kind regards,
Petr

> Mimi

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 11:53 [PATCH v2 1/4] ima_violations.sh: force $LOG ToMToU violation earlier Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ima_violations.sh: Update validate() to support multiple violations Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 13:31   ` Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 14:44     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 14:59       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 17:43         ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-03-04 21:33           ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ima_violations.sh: additional open-writer violation tests Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ima_violations.sh: additional ToMToU " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ima_violations.sh: force $LOG ToMToU violation earlier Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 13:06   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 13:34     ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250304174342.GA97130@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox