linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srish Srinivasan <ssrish@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org,
	ajd@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com,
	rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Correct secvar format representation for static key management
Date: Tue,  3 Jun 2025 15:27:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250603095736.99007-2-ssrish@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603095736.99007-1-ssrish@linux.ibm.com>

On a PLPKS enabled PowerVM LPAR, the secvar format property for static
key management is misrepresented as "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown", creating
reason for confusion.

Static key management mode uses fixed, built-in keys. Dynamic key
management mode allows keys to be updated in production to handle
security updates without firmware rebuilds.

Define a function named plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode() to retrieve the
key management mode based on the existence of the SB_VERSION property
in the firmware.

Set the secvar format property to either "ibm,plpks-sb-v<version>" or
"ibm,plpks-sb-v0" based on the key management mode, and return the
length of the secvar format property.

Co-developed-by: Souradeep <soura@imap.linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Souradeep <soura@imap.linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srish Srinivasan <ssrish@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-secvar        | 10 ++-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c | 76 +++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-secvar b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-secvar
index 857cf12b0904..f001a4f4bd2e 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-secvar
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-secvar
@@ -22,9 +22,13 @@ Description:	A string indicating which backend is in use by the firmware.
 		and is expected to be "ibm,edk2-compat-v1".
 
 		On pseries/PLPKS, this is generated by the kernel based on the
-		version number in the SB_VERSION variable in the keystore, and
-		has the form "ibm,plpks-sb-v<version>", or
-		"ibm,plpks-sb-unknown" if there is no SB_VERSION variable.
+		version number in the SB_VERSION variable in the keystore. The
+		version numbering in the SB_VERSION variable starts from 1. The
+		format string takes the form "ibm,plpks-sb-v<version>" in the
+		case of dynamic key management mode. If the SB_VERSION variable
+		does not exist (or there is an error while reading it), it takes
+		the form "ibm,plpks-sb-v0", indicating that the key management
+		mode is static.
 
 What:		/sys/firmware/secvar/vars/<variable name>
 Date:		August 2019
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
index 257fd1f8bc19..767e5e8c6990 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
@@ -152,39 +152,55 @@ static int plpks_set_variable(const char *key, u64 key_len, u8 *data,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-// PLPKS dynamic secure boot doesn't give us a format string in the same way OPAL does.
-// Instead, report the format using the SB_VERSION variable in the keystore.
-// The string is made up by us, and takes the form "ibm,plpks-sb-v<n>" (or "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown"
-// if the SB_VERSION variable doesn't exist). Hypervisor defines the SB_VERSION variable as a
-// "1 byte unsigned integer value".
-static ssize_t plpks_secvar_format(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
+/*
+ * Return the key management mode.
+ *
+ * SB_VERSION is defined as a "1 byte unsigned integer value", taking values
+ * starting from 1. It is owned by the Partition Firmware and its presence
+ * indicates that the key management mode is dynamic. Any failure in
+ * reading SB_VERSION defaults the key management mode to static. The error
+ * codes -ENOENT or -EPERM are expected in static key management mode. An
+ * unexpected error code will have to be investigated. Only signed variables
+ * have null bytes in their names, SB_VERSION does not.
+ *
+ * Return 0 to indicate that the key management mode is static. Otherwise
+ * return the SB_VERSION value to indicate that the key management mode is
+ * dynamic.
+ */
+static u8 plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode(void)
 {
-	struct plpks_var var = {0};
-	ssize_t ret;
-	u8 version;
-
-	var.component = NULL;
-	// Only the signed variables have null bytes in their names, this one doesn't
-	var.name = "SB_VERSION";
-	var.namelen = strlen(var.name);
-	var.datalen = 1;
-	var.data = &version;
-
-	// Unlike the other vars, SB_VERSION is owned by firmware instead of the OS
-	ret = plpks_read_fw_var(&var);
-	if (ret) {
-		if (ret == -ENOENT) {
-			ret = snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown");
-		} else {
-			pr_err("Error %ld reading SB_VERSION from firmware\n", ret);
-			ret = -EIO;
-		}
-		goto err;
+	u8 mode;
+	ssize_t rc;
+	struct plpks_var var = {
+		.component = NULL,
+		.name = "SB_VERSION",
+		.namelen = 10,
+		.datalen = 1,
+		.data = &mode,
+	};
+
+	rc = plpks_read_fw_var(&var);
+	if (rc) {
+		if (rc != -ENOENT && rc != -EPERM)
+			pr_info("Error %ld reading SB_VERSION from firmware\n", rc);
+		mode = 0;
 	}
+	return mode;
+}
 
-	ret = snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-v%hhu", version);
-err:
-	return ret;
+/*
+ * PLPKS dynamic secure boot doesn't give us a format string in the same way
+ * OPAL does. Instead, report the format using the SB_VERSION variable in the
+ * keystore. The string, made up by us, takes the form of either
+ * "ibm,plpks-sb-v<n>" or "ibm,plpks-sb-v0", based on the key management mode,
+ * and return the length of the secvar format property.
+ */
+static ssize_t plpks_secvar_format(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
+{
+	u8 mode;
+
+	mode = plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode();
+	return snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-v%hhu", mode);
 }
 
 static int plpks_max_size(u64 *max_size)
-- 
2.47.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-03  9:57 [PATCH v3 0/3] Enhancements to the secvar interface in static key management mode Srish Srinivasan
2025-06-03  9:57 ` Srish Srinivasan [this message]
2025-06-03  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/secvar: Expose secvars relevant to the " Srish Srinivasan
2025-06-03  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] integrity/platform_certs: Allow loading of keys in the static " Srish Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250603095736.99007-2-ssrish@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ssrish@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).