public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
	 Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	 Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	 Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	 James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	 Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] EVM: add comment describing why ino field is still unsigned long
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:43:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310-iino-u64-v1-2-18422a053b04@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310-iino-u64-v1-0-18422a053b04@kernel.org>

Mimi pointed out that we didn't widen the inode number field in struct
h_misc alongside the inode->i_ino widening. While we could make an
equivalent change there, that would force EVM remeasurement on all
32-bit hosts.

Instead, leave the field as an unsigned long. This should have no effect
on 64-bit hosts, and allow things to continue working on 32-bit hosts in
the cases where the i_ino fits in 32-bits.

Add a comment explaining why it's being left as unsigned long.

Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
 security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
index c0ca4eedb0fe5d5c30f45f515a4bc90248ec64ea..3445f4c2097f7e8af61de6299b721fc4a1d8afb4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
@@ -144,6 +144,12 @@ static void hmac_add_misc(struct shash_desc *desc, struct inode *inode,
 			  char type, char *digest)
 {
 	struct h_misc {
+		/*
+		 * Although inode->i_ino is now u64, this field remains
+		 * unsigned long to allow existing hashes from 32-bit hosts
+		 * to continue working when i_ino hasn't changed and fitsxi
+		 * in a u32.
+		 */
 		unsigned long ino;
 		__u32 generation;
 		uid_t uid;

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 11:43 [PATCH 0/2] vfs: follow-on fixes for i_ino widening Jeff Layton
2026-03-10 11:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix 64-bit division operations in nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group() Jeff Layton
2026-03-10 13:01   ` Ryusuke Konishi
2026-03-10 16:54   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-03-10 17:28     ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-10 11:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-03-10 16:05   ` [PATCH 2/2] EVM: add comment describing why ino field is still unsigned long Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260310-iino-u64-v1-2-18422a053b04@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox