From: Richard Lyu <richard.lyu@suse.com>
To: jarkko@kernel.org
Cc: fourier.thomas@gmail.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterhuewe@gmx.de, richard.lyu@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] tpm: Remove ineffective wmb() from tpm_pm_resume()
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:44:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910024430.40418-1-richard.lyu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqIVn0cDBvIYKggE@r1chard>
The comment above the wmb() in tpm_pm_resume() states that the barrier
guarantees TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED is written last, so that hwrng does
not activate before the chip has been fully resumed. It cannot do so:
it is placed after the store that clears the flag, and therefore does
not order the preceding resume work before that store. It also has
nothing to pair with, as tpm_try_get_ops() contains no matching read
barrier.
Drop the barrier along with the comment rather than leave a no-op
behind. Should such ordering turn out to be needed, it would require
paired barriers or locking.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a62fc816-259a-4d28-a265-e425bc17ed50@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Richard Lyu <richard.lyu@suse.com>
---
v2:
- Drop the Fixes tag: this is a cleanup, not a bug fix.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aqIVn0cDBvIYKggE@r1chard/
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
index b4e749e70b02..0bab78c8767c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -497,12 +497,6 @@ int tpm_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED;
- /*
- * Guarantee that SUSPENDED is written last, so that hwrng does not
- * activate before the chip has been fully resumed.
- */
- wmb();
-
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_pm_resume);
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 9:58 [PATCH] tpm: Remove ineffective wmb() from tpm_pm_resume() Richard Lyu
2026-09-09 22:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-09-10 2:27 ` Richard Lyu
2026-09-10 2:44 ` Richard Lyu [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-10 2:46 [PATCH v2] " Richard Lyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910024430.40418-1-richard.lyu@suse.com \
--to=richard.lyu@suse.com \
--cc=fourier.thomas@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox