Re: [PATCH] tpm: Check return value of crypto_kpp_set_secret()

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 02:32:37AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Adding Mimi and Roberto.
> 
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 04:40:09PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 01:28:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if it already is but if it isn't, probably also at
> > > linux-integrity turning on Sashiko would make sense.
> > 
> > Sashiko currently has monitoring enabled for linux-integrity, but not
> > email replies
> > (https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml#L45).
> > 
> > (Note: this particular patch was Cc'ed to linux-crypto, which does have
> > Sashiko email replies enabled.  So Sashiko would have replied if it had
> > found an issue anyway.)
> > 
> > I definitely would support enabling email replies on linux-integrity
> > (for issues found only), like a lot of other lists already do:
> > 
> >    ["linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"]
> >    reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]         
> > 
> > If the maintainers of security/integrity/ would ack that, I can open a
> > pull request to the Sashiko GitHub repo that changes it.  Or someone
> > else can go ahead and do it if they want.
> > 

Mimi and Roberto, any thoughts on whether you want Sashiko replies
enabled on linux-integrity?

- Eric