From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
noodles@fb.com, bauermann@kolabnow.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: code@tyhicks.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
paul@paul-moore.com, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ima: implement function to allocate buffer at kexec load
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:59:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31eb2a9c-7410-b655-43d2-3b2966d2d3da@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494dffc6cc7cfb8c6ca78f3bae442d57362a8857.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Adding Eric to cc.
On 7/7/23 06:00, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 14:57 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>> IMA does not provide a mechanism to allocate memory for IMA log storage
>> during kexec operation.
> The IMA measurement list is currently being carried across kexec, so
> obviously a buffer is being allocated for it. IMA not allocating
> memory for the measurment list is not the problem statement. Please
> concisely provide the problem statement, explaining why IMA needs to
> allocate the buffer.
>
I meant IMA does not provide separate functions to allocate buffer and
populate measurements. Both operations are wrapped in an atomic
ima_dump_measurement_list().
As I mentioned in the comment in the cover letter, if there is no such
technical limitation to allocate the buffer and copy the measurements at
kexec ‘execute’ – I will make the necessary code changes and update the
above line in the patch description accordingly.
>> The function should handle the scenario where
>> the kexec load is called multiple times.
> Currently the buffer is being freed with the kexec 'unload'. With this
> patch IMA is allocating a buffer for the measurement list, which needs
> to be freed independently of the kexec 'unload'.
If we end up allocating the buffer at kexec ‘execute’ (which results in
soft boot to next Kernel) – is it technically possible that
kexec ‘unload’ being called after calling kexec ‘execute’?
If not, should I still free the buffer at kexec ‘unload’ in this
scenario?
~Tushar
>> Implement a function to allocate buffer of size kexec_segment_size at
>> kexec load. If the buffer was already allocated, free that buffer and
>> reallocate. Finally, initialihze ima_khdr struct.
>>
>> The patch operates under the assumption that the segment size does not
>> change between kexec load and execute.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-03 21:56 [PATCH 00/10] ima: measure events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] ima: implement function to allocate buffer at kexec load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 17:59 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2023-07-11 21:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-12 19:49 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] ima: implement function to populate buffer at kexec execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 18:05 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] ima: allocate buffer at kexec load to hold ima measurements Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 18:31 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-11 20:16 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-12 19:39 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] ima: implement functions to suspend and resume measurements Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] kexec: implement functions to map and unmap segment to kimage Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 12:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-11 18:41 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-11 19:19 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-12 19:51 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] ima: update buffer at kexec execute with ima measurements Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 15:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-07 19:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 19:08 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-12 15:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 19:05 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] ima: remove function ima_dump_measurement_list Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 19:11 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] ima: implement and register a reboot notifier function to update kexec buffer Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] ima: suspend measurements while the kexec buffer is being copied Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] kexec: update kexec_file_load syscall to call ima_kexec_post_load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 8:20 ` RuiRui Yang
2023-07-11 19:14 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-12 1:28 ` RuiRui Yang
2023-07-12 19:30 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 8:18 ` [PATCH 00/10] ima: measure events between kexec load and execute Dave Young
2023-07-11 17:52 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 17:51 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-09-22 18:59 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31eb2a9c-7410-b655-43d2-3b2966d2d3da@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).