From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eric.snowberg@oracle.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com, matthewgarrett@google.com,
sashal@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] IMA: Define workqueue for early boot "key" measurements
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:55:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503845c9-beeb-b520-ec3f-af5fa7d2b91f@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1576761104.4579.426.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 12/19/19 5:11 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> Getting rid of the temporary list is definitely a big improvement. As
> James suggested, using test_and_set_bit() and test_bit() would improve
> this code even more. I think, James correct me if I'm wrong, you
> would be able to get rid of both the mutex and "process".
>
> Mimi
I am not sure if the mutex can be removed.
In ima_queue_key() we need to test the flag and add the key to the list
as an atomic operation:
if (!test_bit())
insert_key_to_list
Suppose the if condition is true, but before we could insert the key to
the list, ima_process_queued_keys() runs and processes queued keys we'll
add the key to the list and never process it.
Is there an API in the kernel to test and add an entry to a list
atomically?
thanks,
-lakshmi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 16:44 [PATCH v5 0/2] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-18 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] IMA: Define workqueue for early boot "key" measurements Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-19 13:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-19 16:55 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2019-12-20 12:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-18 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-20 19:01 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys Mimi Zohar
2019-12-20 19:25 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-20 19:36 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-20 20:50 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503845c9-beeb-b520-ec3f-af5fa7d2b91f@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthewgarrett@google.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).