From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, noodles@fb.com,
bauermann@kolabnow.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: code@tyhicks.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] ima: make the memory for events between kexec load and exec configurable
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:39:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55585644-2170-d462-4d64-ca3a963b30fe@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8828617-a296-8498-5e1f-b75a089916e0@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/12/23 17:27, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> On 10/5/23 14:26, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>> IMA currently allocates half a PAGE_SIZE for the extra events that would
>> be measured between kexec 'load' and 'execute'. Depending on the IMA
>> policy and the system state, that memory may not be sufficient to hold
>> the extra IMA events measured after kexec 'load'. The memory
>> requirements vary from system to system and they should be configurable.
>>
>> Define a Kconfig option, IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES, to configure the number
>> of extra pages to be allocated for IMA measurements added in the window
>> from kexec 'load' to kexec 'execute'.
>>
>> Update ima_add_kexec_buffer() function to allocate memory based on the
>> Kconfig option value, rather than the currently hardcoded one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi<tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> index 60a511c6b583..1b55cd2bcb36 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> @@ -338,3 +338,12 @@ config IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE
>> default n
>> help
>> This option disables htable to allow measurement of duplicate
>> records.
>> +
>> +config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES
>> + int
>> + depends on IMA && IMA_KEXEC
>> + default 16
>> + help
>> + IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES determines the number of extra
>> + pages to be allocated for IMA measurements added in the
>> + window from kexec 'load' to kexec 'execute'.
>
>
> On ppc64 a page is 64kb. I would ask for additional kb here.
>
>
Not sure I understand. Do you mean I should make the default value of
the config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES 64 or something?
In code, I multiply the config value with PAGE_SIZE. So more memory
would be allocated on ppc64 for given default config value. Could you
please clarify what change you are suggesting here?
+ binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
+ sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr) +
+ (CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES *
PAGE_SIZE);
~Tushar
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> index 13fbbb90319b..6cd5f46a7208 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> @@ -150,15 +150,18 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>> int ret;
>> /*
>> - * Reserve an extra half page of memory for additional measurements
>> - * added during the kexec load.
>> + * Reserve extra memory for measurements added in the window from
>> + * kexec 'load' to kexec 'execute'.
>> */
>> - binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
>> + binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
>> + sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr) +
>> + (CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE);
>> +
>> if (binary_runtime_size >= ULONG_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
>> kexec_segment_size = ULONG_MAX;
>> else
>> - kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
>> - PAGE_SIZE / 2, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(binary_runtime_size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> +
>> if ((kexec_segment_size == ULONG_MAX) ||
>> ((kexec_segment_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages() / 2)) {
>> pr_err("Binary measurement list too large.\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-05 18:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ima: refactor ima_dump_measurement_list to move memory allocation to a separate function Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:33 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-20 21:21 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 21:50 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-26 20:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-10-27 3:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-14 22:32 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-14 22:31 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ima: move ima_dump_measurement_list call from kexec load to execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:35 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <989af3e9a8621f57643b67b717d9a39fdb2ffe24.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 22:43 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-15 22:30 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ima: kexec: map source pages containing IMA buffer to image post kexec load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:29 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:36 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] kexec: update kexec_file_load syscall to call ima_kexec_post_load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ima: suspend measurements while the buffer is being copied during kexec reboot Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ima: make the memory for events between kexec load and exec configurable Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:27 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:39 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2023-10-20 21:16 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 21:53 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ima: record log size at kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:27 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:40 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <2b95e8b9ebe10a24c7cb6fc90cb2d1342a157ed5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 22:48 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <8f87e7e4fe5c5a24cdc0d3e2267eeaf00825d1bb.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-10-27 19:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between " Mimi Zohar
2023-11-15 19:21 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-14 23:24 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55585644-2170-d462-4d64-ca3a963b30fe@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).