From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB7D165F13; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 02:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741747915; cv=none; b=qgMSmChBJ/JwkwszhU2SFiTAKAMB3DVmVVp3pav+7eMzGWK1UZ7c6ZVhcBqiDtqGQJ1w0JFvAqH0CeTCl2j95gD5Wzus8LFxAHbff3dBOZmek1T0OdrkENHjnC2cSj8f3vVVO61f5KowmmTR+lhvTbNakSj9fUlFxAdGQS+Rb7w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741747915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=odQu+YbNOqP4hHDB4GXFaIIi08qe4rGyQ0NRo1CGb5A=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nmLDvoG/zMQSUfIH2tTAK4FzqF8KVFDQmXttK5+yF+YKjcv4hCsIoZzdRg+VRgrElixauGcwc2CnMoJirxn4aN5nsVT/QAUhBFJjrCZfV+xvlzyg9nEsYGVuzp5ARBFfiERYQnerUH+JqCExTZKm17yQU4tFlrJszF73rAjNyII= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252E152B; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.119.39.65] (unknown [10.119.39.65]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 794B73F673; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <635af7df-be7c-4eb1-95d7-cad26a2af787@arm.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:51:49 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Build error on -next due to tpm_crb.c changes? To: Thorsten Leemhuis , jarkko@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, peterhuewe@gmx.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List References: <20250305173611.74548-1-stuart.yoder@arm.com> <0ad035ff-400e-4b15-8b8f-40b69152ec46@leemhuis.info> <92bc0a65-608f-4307-bb1c-16d8836d42e5@arm.com> <77fb9077-f598-4308-8862-6d09b23688bb@leemhuis.info> Content-Language: en-US From: Stuart Yoder In-Reply-To: <77fb9077-f598-4308-8862-6d09b23688bb@leemhuis.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/11/25 11:51 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 11.03.25 16:53, Stuart Yoder wrote: >> On 3/11/25 10:21 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> On 05.03.25 18:36, Stuart Yoder wrote: >> [...] >> So, it should not be possible on one had have >> CONFIG_TCG_ARM_CRB_FFA being true when building tpm_crb.c >> and false resulting in the tpm_crb_ffa.o not being >> picked up in the build. > > Many thx for the answer. Maybe Fedora's way to prepare the .config files > (which my package builds use to be close to Fedora's official packages) > is doing something odd/wrong. Will take a closer look and report back. It would help to be able to see the .config to see how the relevant config options were set. Thanks, Stuart