From: Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security/integrity: fix pointer to ESL data and its size on pseries
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 08:28:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a4cac35-efa9-40f6-ae0f-ad3509ef7fbb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CT5V56O3NZS8.1V2L3JJWRKIOE@suppilovahvero>
On 6/6/23 16:51, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue Jun 6, 2023 at 8:26 PM EEST, Nayna Jain wrote:
>> On PowerVM guest, variable data is prefixed with 8 bytes of timestamp.
>> Extract ESL by stripping off the timestamp before passing to ESL parser.
>>
> Cc: stable@vger.kenrnel.org # v6.3
>
> ?
Aah yes. Missed that.. Thanks..
>
>> Fixes: 4b3e71e9a34c ("integrity/powerpc: Support loading keys from PLPKS")
>> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> .../integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c | 39 ++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c
>> index b9de70b90826..57768cbf1fd3 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
>> #include "keyring_handler.h"
>> #include "../integrity.h"
>>
>> +#define extract_data(db, data, size, offset) \
>> + do { db = data + offset; size = size - offset; } while (0)
>> +
>> /*
>> * Get a certificate list blob from the named secure variable.
>> *
>> @@ -55,8 +58,10 @@ static __init void *get_cert_list(u8 *key, unsigned long keylen, u64 *size)
>> */
>> static int __init load_powerpc_certs(void)
>> {
>> + void *data = NULL;
>> + u64 dsize = 0;
>> + u64 offset = 0;
>> void *db = NULL, *dbx = NULL;
> So... what do you need db still for?
>
> If you meant to rename 'db' to 'data', then you should not do it, since this is
> a bug fix. It is zero gain, and a factor harder backport.
In case of PowerVM guest, data points to timestamp + ESL. And then with
offset of 8 bytes, db points to ESL.
While db is used for parsing ESL, data is then later used to free
(timestamp + ESL) memory.
Hope it answers the question.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
>
>> - u64 dbsize = 0, dbxsize = 0;
>> int rc = 0;
>> ssize_t len;
>> char buf[32];
>> @@ -74,38 +79,46 @@ static int __init load_powerpc_certs(void)
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> + if (strcmp("ibm,plpks-sb-v1", buf) == 0)
>> + /* PLPKS authenticated variables ESL data is prefixed with 8 bytes of timestamp */
>> + offset = 8;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Get db, and dbx. They might not exist, so it isn't an error if we
>> * can't get them.
>> */
>> - db = get_cert_list("db", 3, &dbsize);
>> - if (!db) {
>> + data = get_cert_list("db", 3, &dsize);
>> + if (!data) {
>> pr_info("Couldn't get db list from firmware\n");
>> - } else if (IS_ERR(db)) {
>> - rc = PTR_ERR(db);
>> + } else if (IS_ERR(data)) {
>> + rc = PTR_ERR(data);
>> pr_err("Error reading db from firmware: %d\n", rc);
>> return rc;
>> } else {
>> - rc = parse_efi_signature_list("powerpc:db", db, dbsize,
>> + extract_data(db, data, dsize, offset);
>> +
>> + rc = parse_efi_signature_list("powerpc:db", db, dsize,
>> get_handler_for_db);
>> if (rc)
>> pr_err("Couldn't parse db signatures: %d\n", rc);
>> - kfree(db);
>> + kfree(data);
>> }
>>
>> - dbx = get_cert_list("dbx", 4, &dbxsize);
>> - if (!dbx) {
>> + data = get_cert_list("dbx", 4, &dsize);
>> + if (!data) {
>> pr_info("Couldn't get dbx list from firmware\n");
>> - } else if (IS_ERR(dbx)) {
>> - rc = PTR_ERR(dbx);
>> + } else if (IS_ERR(data)) {
>> + rc = PTR_ERR(data);
>> pr_err("Error reading dbx from firmware: %d\n", rc);
>> return rc;
>> } else {
>> - rc = parse_efi_signature_list("powerpc:dbx", dbx, dbxsize,
>> + extract_data(dbx, data, dsize, offset);
>> +
>> + rc = parse_efi_signature_list("powerpc:dbx", dbx, dsize,
>> get_handler_for_dbx);
>> if (rc)
>> pr_err("Couldn't parse dbx signatures: %d\n", rc);
>> - kfree(dbx);
>> + kfree(data);
>> }
>>
>> return rc;
>> --
>> 2.31.1
> BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-07 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 17:26 [PATCH] security/integrity: fix pointer to ESL data and its size on pseries Nayna Jain
2023-06-06 20:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-06-07 12:28 ` Nayna [this message]
2023-06-07 16:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a4cac35-efa9-40f6-ae0f-ad3509ef7fbb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcwilson@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox