From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EC3C388F9 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C2C21556 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="YH94LE4D" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1829396AbgJ0THP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:07:15 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52608 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2902408AbgJ0THP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:07:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09RJ2BPf095690; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:06:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=wrqPoi6ZU2Fj+Hc8kvhewdQN8S6Jr8BOn32nnAT4PTY=; b=YH94LE4DeC5gnvRwWNwHKCUTOENYCK0h7t10DnCpvhMvUUmW42uVZydFwbiuYiGySeLj rbEpOLUO67xbB/BU4omROdS3ZbaRMQ9rTTz2K58V3sqN+J320jaysZACEMoA7Bs2DLGI vOtMWFMupnNMkc0TwBcUZDA/TKqURMK4O4l4pcYwfDLqk1dkw7DAqWEiAJkxPTXALjtm 4VvUi9G4rCoVHkeWIldbWGhhlzIzRO7y8TSumlRWqg0uGf8b8DipGQlkKQT72g8Avrc0 kvqPKwvZSbovDt4dk0/jnVL9Eo11WJio7ykQ25BzDXsb9y1Uf8w2KYn/srCjH3iAxkus OA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34ekqddkex-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 09RJ3BjI100857; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34ekqddke2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09RIqo89007295; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:57 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 34cbhh3pan-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:57 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 09RJ6t2T30015994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:55 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB6CAE055; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C3EAE04D; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.14.152]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <6d213e5decd0bf1290ae37e2da353aae504f2581.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH ima-evm-utils] boot_aggregate.test: Skip if CONFIG_IMA not enabled From: Mimi Zohar To: Mikhail Novosyolov , Petr Vorel , Wartan Hachaturow Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:06:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20201019200803.35255-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> <20201020180231.GA14580@dell5510> <26b4d298f9a71a796793f2ce730a95ebec442f29.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-12.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-27_10:2020-10-26,2020-10-27 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010270109 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 21:51 +0300, Mikhail Novosyolov wrote: > Hello, > > 27.10.2020 19:06, Mimi Zohar пишет: > > [Cc'ing Wartan Hachaturow] > > > > Hi Wartan, > > > > On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 20:02 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > >>>> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/972459 linux: Reenable CONFIG_IMA > >>> I wasn't aware that because of lockdown, IMA was disabled. Thank you > >>> for reporting and updating the IMA w/lockdown status. > >> Feel free to comment it, please. It'd be nice to have IMA in Debian (not sure > >> about Ubuntu status). > >> > >> @Dmitry: do you plan to update Debian package? (you're the listed maintainer, > >> although the package was signed by Wartan Hachaturow). > > Earlier this year Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov posted a patch to add > > libressl support to ima-evm-utils. Part of the reason for our adding > > travis support was in order to create a testing matrix for testing > > openssl, libressl, ibmtss and tpm2-tss, which further led to the > > travis-docker distro support. (Due to some issues, the libressl > > support was not upstreamed.) > > Mimi, it was me who posted patch for LibreSSL ("[PATCH] ima-evm- > utils: Fix compatibility with LibreSSL"), but unfortunately I did not > have enough time to finish it properly (I am very sorry...). > > I was just going to try a newer version of ima-evm-utils and, if > possible, continue upstreamizing support of LibreSSL. also, a > colleague of mine made an additional patch which requires separate > upstreamization. Was there another patch from Dmitry about which I do > not know Mikhail, my mistake. Thank you for the correction! Testing the libressl changes should be a lot easier now. Please remember to include a distro travis.yml example. thanks, Mimi