From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tpm: add sysfs exports for all banks of PCR registers
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:02:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877duwl8n9.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595374674.3575.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
James Bottomley @ 2020-07-21 16:37 MST:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:16 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>> James Bottomley @ 2020-07-21 08:56 MST:
> [...]
>> > + /*
>> > + * This will only trigger if someone has added an
>> > additional
>> > + * hash to the tpm_algorithms enum without incrementing
>> > + * TPM_MAX_HASHES. This has to be a BUG_ON because under
>> > this
>> > + * condition, the chip->groups array will overflow
>> > corrupting
>> > + * the chips structure.
>> > + */
>> > + BUG_ON(chip->groups_cnt > TPM_MAX_HASHES);
>>
>> Should this check be 3 + TPM_MAX_HASHES like below?
>
> No, because at this point only a single additional group has been
> addedin addition to the hashes groups. The first line of
> tpm_sysfs_add_device is
>
> WARN_ON(chip->groups_cnt != 0);
>
> And then we add the unnamed group. This loop over the banks follows
> it, so chip->groups_cnt should be nr_banks_allocated by the end (it's
> the index, which is one fewer than the number of entries in chip-
>>groups[]). We have a problem if nr_banks_allocated > TPM_MAX_HASHES
> which is what the BUG_ON checks.
>
> James
If the chip supported all 5 listed cases wouldn't groups_cnt be 6 at this
point?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-22 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 15:56 [PATCH v2 0/1] add sysfs exports for TPM 2 PCR registers James Bottomley
2020-07-21 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] tpm: add sysfs exports for all banks of " James Bottomley
2020-07-21 16:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-07-21 23:16 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-07-21 23:37 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-22 0:02 ` Jerry Snitselaar [this message]
2020-07-22 0:39 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-22 0:51 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-07-22 15:29 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877duwl8n9.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).