Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS binding

Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-04-13T21:49:49Z

On Sat Apr 13, 2024 at 11:10 AM EEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/04/2024 09:15, M. Haener wrote:
> > From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@siemens.com>
> >
>
> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
> your patch is touching.
>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The "dt-bindings"
> prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> See also:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>
>
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> > index 3ab4434b7352..af7720dc4a12 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ properties:
> > - enum:
> > - infineon,slb9673
> > - nuvoton,npct75x
> > + - st,st33ktpm2xi2c
>
> I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need
> second patch? Plus binding come before users.
>
> Please explain what are you doing in other patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thanks, I agree with the remarks. So holding for update.

BR, Jarkko