Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS binding

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-13T21:13:50Z

On 13/04/2024 22:26, Haener, Michael wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 10:38 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/04/2024 09:15, M. Haener wrote:
>>> From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@siemens.com>
>>>
>>> Add the ST chip st33ktpm2xi2c to the supported compatible strings
>>> of the
>>> TPM TIS I2C schema. The Chip is compliant with the TCG PC Client
>>> TPM
>>> Profile specification.
>>>
>>> For reference, a datasheet is available at:
>>> https://www.st.com/resource/en/data_brief/st33ktpm2xi2c.pdf
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Haener <michael.haener@siemens.com>
>>> ---
>>
>>
>> Not tested...
>
> I was only able to verify and test the conformity of the ST chip
> st33ktpm2xi2c with kernel 6.1, so I left out the test-by tag.

I don't mean your tag. Your SoB means you tested it, but I meant you did
not send the binding for testing via automation.

> Unfortunately, there is no newer kernel for my embedded hardware.
>
>>
>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary
>> people
>> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
>> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
>> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>>
>> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
>> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on
>> some
>> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
>> (don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
>> don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
>> about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the
>> patchset.
>>
>> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
>> tested by automated tooling.
>
> I called the script scripts/get_maintainer.pl on the latest kernel
> version for each of the two patches and added the output list to the
> individual patches accordingly. And only for the cover-letter I linked
> the two lists together.
> I understand now that I should have sent the whole series to both
> lists.
>

No, that's not the case. You did not Cc output of get_maintainer.pl.
Read *AGAIN* my message..

Best regards,
Krzysztof