From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Writing out EVM protected xattrs while EVM is active
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:13:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACdnJuscweoJFresHzoQ_va9-eokz12VMz_T2kpJb-iJeSbGzg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508292499.4513.99.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 19:02 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> Is this accurate? If there's no IMA policy that covers the file in
>> question (eg, appraise is limited to a specific security context or
>> owner), will IMA_NEW ever be set? It looks like that codepath will
>> only be entered if there's a rule that matches. The EVM xattr
>> protections appear to be called regardless, which means that there's
>> then no way to write out attributes on them at runtime.
>
> Updating/writing security.evm is triggered by writing or updating ANY
> file metadata included in the HMAC calculation. There is no
> requirement for security.ima to exist.
In this case there's no symmetric key loaded, so security.evm won't be
updated. Here's what's happening:
1) Configure an IMA policy that only appraises a subset of files
2) Create a new file that does not match the appraisal rule.
IMA_NEW_FILE isn't set because no rule matched.
3) Attempt to write security.ima, security.capability and security.evm
on the new file. EVM blocks this because IMA_NEW_FILE isn't set.
I may be misdiagnosing this, but as far as I can tell IMA_NEW_FILE is
only set in ima_appraise_measurement() if action is set to something,
and if ima_match_rules() doesn't match then this will never be the
case?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 23:12 Writing out EVM protected xattrs while EVM is active Matthew Garrett
2017-10-18 1:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 2:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-18 2:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 2:13 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2017-10-18 2:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 17:27 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-18 17:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 18:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-18 18:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 18:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-18 18:38 ` Mimi Zohar
[not found] ` <CACE9dm_vpTi705PJxGZkeNWUyHALZzVc2x=RUw_p=DZCPZfoXw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-10-18 18:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2017-10-19 11:14 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-18 18:19 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-19 11:00 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2017-10-19 17:06 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACdnJuscweoJFresHzoQ_va9-eokz12VMz_T2kpJb-iJeSbGzg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).