From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
"Daniil Stas" <daniil.stas@posteo.net>,
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<regressions@leemhuis.info>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 21:52:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CUHFOCLWR4VO.OLBGKIXELSIN@suppilovahvero> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61b363bc-286a-535c-27da-0f52673768ad@amd.com>
On Tue Aug 1, 2023 at 6:04 AM EEST, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 7/31/23 18:40, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been tracking this issue with Mario on various threads and
> > bugzilla for a while now. My suggestion over at bugzilla was to just
> > disable all current AMD fTPMs by bumping the check for a major version
> > number, so that the hardware people can reenable it i it's ever fixed,
> > but only if this is something that the hardware people would actually
> > respect. As I understand it, Mario was going to check into it and see.
> > Failing that, yea, just disabling hwrng on fTPM seems like a fine
> > enough thing to do.
> >
> > The reason I'm not too concerned about that is twofold:
> > - Systems with fTPM all have RDRAND anyway, so there's no entropy problem.
> > - fTPM *probably* uses the same random source as RDRAND -- the
> > TRNG_OUT MMIO register -- so it's not really doing much more than what
> > we already have available.
>
> Yeah I have conversations ongoing about this topic, but also I concluded
> your suspicion is correct. They both get their values from the
> integrated CCP HW IP.
>
> >
> > So this all seems fine. And Jarkko's patch seems more or less the
> > straight forward way of disabling it. But with that said, in order of
> > priority, maybe we should first try these:
> >
> > 1) Adjust the version check to a major-place fTPM version that AMD's
> > hardware team pinky swears will have this bug fixed. (Though, I can
> > already imagine somebody on the list shouting, "we don't trust
> > hardware teams to do anything with unreleased stuff!", which could be
> > valid.)
>
> I find it very likely the actual root cause is similar to what Linus
> suggested. If that's the case I don't think the bug can be fixed
> by just an fTPM fix but would rather require a BIOS fix.
>
> This to me strengthens the argument to either not register fTPM as RNG
> in the first place or just use TPM for boot time entropy.
>
> > 2) Remove the version check, but add some other query to detect AMD
> > fTPM vs realTPM, and ban fTPM.
>
> AMD doesn't make dTPMs, only fTPMs. It's tempting to try to use
> TPM2_PT_VENDOR_TPM_TYPE, but this actually is a vendor specific value.
>
> I don't see a reliable way in the spec to do this.
>
> > - Remove the version check, and just check for AMD; this is Jarrko's patch.
>
> I have a counter-proposal to Jarkko's patch attached. This has two
> notable changes:
>
> 1) It only disables RNG generation in the case of having RDRAND or RDSEED.
> 2) It also matches Intel PTT.
>
> I still do also think Linus' idea of TPMs only providing boot time
> entropy is worth weighing out.
You should add something like TPM_CHIP_HWRNG_DISABLED instead and
set this in tpm_crb before calling tpm_chip_register().
Nothing else concerning AMD hardware should be done in tpm-chip.c.
It should only check TPM_CHIP_HWRNG_DISABLED in the beginning of
tpm_add_hwrng().
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 20:19 [PATCH 0/1] Avoid triggering an fTPM bug from kernel Mario Limonciello
2023-02-14 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs Mario Limonciello
2023-02-17 15:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-02-17 22:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-18 2:25 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-21 22:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-21 23:10 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-27 10:57 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-02-27 11:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-27 11:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-17 22:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-27 15:38 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 15:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 16:39 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 16:41 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 16:50 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 16:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 17:05 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-28 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:01 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-28 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:47 ` Limonciello, Mario
[not found] ` <CUGAV1Y993FB.1O2Q691015Z2C@seitikki>
2023-07-31 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 19:18 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 21:57 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 23:40 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-08-01 3:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-01 11:36 ` Mateusz Schyboll
2023-08-01 18:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2023-08-01 18:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-01 18:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-01 19:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-02 23:13 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-08-03 0:34 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-31 21:44 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-28 19:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-28 20:18 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-31 10:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-31 10:28 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-31 11:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CUHFOCLWR4VO.OLBGKIXELSIN@suppilovahvero \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=daniil.stas@posteo.net \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox