public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	"Daniil Stas" <daniil.stas@posteo.net>,
	<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<regressions@leemhuis.info>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 21:52:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CUHFOCLWR4VO.OLBGKIXELSIN@suppilovahvero> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61b363bc-286a-535c-27da-0f52673768ad@amd.com>

On Tue Aug 1, 2023 at 6:04 AM EEST, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 7/31/23 18:40, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've been tracking this issue with Mario on various threads and
> > bugzilla for a while now. My suggestion over at bugzilla was to just
> > disable all current AMD fTPMs by bumping the check for a major version
> > number, so that the hardware people can reenable it i it's ever fixed,
> > but only if this is something that the hardware people would actually
> > respect. As I understand it, Mario was going to check into it and see.
> > Failing that, yea, just disabling hwrng on fTPM seems like a fine
> > enough thing to do.
> > 
> > The reason I'm not too concerned about that is twofold:
> > - Systems with fTPM all have RDRAND anyway, so there's no entropy problem.
> > - fTPM *probably* uses the same random source as RDRAND -- the
> > TRNG_OUT MMIO register -- so it's not really doing much more than what
> > we already have available.
>
> Yeah I have conversations ongoing about this topic, but also I concluded
> your suspicion is correct.  They both get their values from the 
> integrated CCP HW IP.
>
> > 
> > So this all seems fine. And Jarkko's patch seems more or less the
> > straight forward way of disabling it. But with that said, in order of
> > priority, maybe we should first try these:
> > 
> > 1) Adjust the version check to a major-place fTPM version that AMD's
> > hardware team pinky swears will have this bug fixed. (Though, I can
> > already imagine somebody on the list shouting, "we don't trust
> > hardware teams to do anything with unreleased stuff!", which could be
> > valid.)
>
> I find it very likely the actual root cause is similar to what Linus 
> suggested.  If that's the case I don't think the bug can be fixed
> by just an fTPM fix but would rather require a BIOS fix.
>
> This to me strengthens the argument to either not register fTPM as RNG 
> in the first place or just use TPM for boot time entropy.
>
> > 2) Remove the version check, but add some other query to detect AMD
> > fTPM vs realTPM, and ban fTPM.
>
> AMD doesn't make dTPMs, only fTPMs.  It's tempting to try to use 
> TPM2_PT_VENDOR_TPM_TYPE, but this actually is a vendor specific value.
>
> I don't see a reliable way in the spec to do this.
>
> > - Remove the version check, and just check for AMD; this is Jarrko's patch.
>
> I have a counter-proposal to Jarkko's patch attached.  This has two 
> notable changes:
>
> 1) It only disables RNG generation in the case of having RDRAND or RDSEED.
> 2) It also matches Intel PTT.
>
> I still do also think Linus' idea of TPMs only providing boot time 
> entropy is worth weighing out.

You should add something like TPM_CHIP_HWRNG_DISABLED instead and
set this in tpm_crb before calling tpm_chip_register().

Nothing else concerning AMD hardware should be done in tpm-chip.c.
It should only check TPM_CHIP_HWRNG_DISABLED in the beginning of
tpm_add_hwrng().

BR, Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-01 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14 20:19 [PATCH 0/1] Avoid triggering an fTPM bug from kernel Mario Limonciello
2023-02-14 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs Mario Limonciello
2023-02-17 15:18   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-02-17 22:35     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-18  2:25       ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-21 22:53         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-21 23:10           ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-27 10:57             ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-02-27 11:14               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-27 11:16                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-17 22:05   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-27 15:38   ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 15:42     ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 16:39       ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 16:41         ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 16:50           ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 16:51             ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 17:05               ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-28 20:41                 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:01                   ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-28 21:38                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:47                       ` Limonciello, Mario
     [not found]                   ` <CUGAV1Y993FB.1O2Q691015Z2C@seitikki>
2023-07-31 19:05                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 19:18                       ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 19:30                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 21:57                           ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 23:28                             ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 23:40                               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-08-01  3:04                                 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-01 11:36                                   ` Mateusz Schyboll
2023-08-01 18:52                                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2023-08-01 18:55                                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:28                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:42                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-01 18:51                           ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-01 19:09                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-02 23:13                             ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-08-03  0:34                               ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-31 21:44                     ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-28 19:30     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-28 20:18       ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-31 10:14         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-31 10:28           ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-31 11:07             ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CUHFOCLWR4VO.OLBGKIXELSIN@suppilovahvero \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=daniil.stas@posteo.net \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox