From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0E56CDD3; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 23:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714434544; cv=none; b=qXHqLw2//wDqicGXqNXLHC3H+lKsWv075h5cGvNX5Kim1q1z4H81ZAvmeOHq//ZJvmPg3wwZat0NnpqQc/gM6y/2WBEGwUBxb9SHryNKBJCUVEzRimDVhdAXxMIjmsoc1kjHesihWwZbZTONw6VNaFur2pRO+1acpXNX5PJOGPE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714434544; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xSsQXyOrQ6MPJvJqVpEYKRwWhsrjUFKtBiWlBvmxFRw=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=qBZWE5N4HXlaVSbNOe2bkJoXGZQYRjSOQbqea7p6M2E3Lbgxc2R+vubO5eFrjj+Hlrc5OqYlSxiJxso2Xkur2hQLMSTiJ4zv4BC1LFRDYLZkmuOG7BpafYrVTXYEns9ti+z0d0FanDk9NT7vngo1kx6R+LY7PC5xZyMnmnLB0gU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=k6Hky8m4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="k6Hky8m4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF92EC113CD; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 23:49:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714434544; bh=xSsQXyOrQ6MPJvJqVpEYKRwWhsrjUFKtBiWlBvmxFRw=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=k6Hky8m4yRGlTQul66L3eTiLkyzKpEvK5uKori74b5BEUsfWvw+TYFDpStk9juEdG ejiaCCZcmuv3ZxhLmmy5kNgyKmFA0NTDXq4n8SZavAePCEDYvqAnfG+J+jm4Fy+SKO 96MfIhkEQ77xNNLsQJlKUprvIK6XtUMhu2pbrT1wKdajc0Sx33G+e4aNiBaw1vfvgv AFMbcbTHzuUM2e4po+XFLFRROtim686lb99t82XA+5kXCXIR4dWSMBnTJxLK/T99aV pajFt/SOu9PIHFIofxff4ln999wJSWwfWQrsK/V7Y+7rBkdw0/gO7YpBe3JwQKBhHi 4/nwTe/sSwoew== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 02:49:00 +0300 Message-Id: Cc: , "Ard Biesheuvel" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/22] add integrity and security to TPM2 transactions From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Jarkko Sakkinen" , "James Bottomley" , , "Stefan Berger" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240429202811.13643-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> In-Reply-To: On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 1:26 AM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Right and obviously 3rd option is to send a PR to > https://gitlab.com/jarkkojs/linux-tpmdd-test. > > I.e. patch file goes to patches/qemu (BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR > points there). Stefan, can I do a "zero QEMU changes" negative test for changing null seed by somehow reseting swtpm? That would be best possible option (if it is possible). It does not matter what side-effects it has on swtpm side as long as the hmac path gets invalidated, as then the device is rendered as unusable. BR, Jarkko