From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
George Wilson <gcwilson@us.ibm.com>,
zgu@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: trusted-encrypted: updates with TEE as a new trust source (update)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 05:14:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/pxC3vvGBsn1T09@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFA6WYPEGGDGqryu1UXNeBsN9NxShEbv8CVxOp=Pt9Vc1LXB4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:45:55PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Mimi and Elaine,
>
> Apologies for my delayed reply as I was busy with other high priority work.
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 22:14, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > Update trusted key documentation with additional comparisons between
> > discrete TPMs and TEE.
>
> Isn't this additional comparison limited to a particular type of TPM
> (discrete TPMs) and ignored other TPM implementations (virtual TPM,
> firmware TPM etc.)? I think your later comment about on-chip versus
> off-chip points at these missing pieces as well.
>
> I would rather suggest comparing TPM and TEE on the basis of
> interfaces and implementation guidelines provided by corresponding
> standards as I think this is the most relevant part to the kernel.
I agree with this point of view.
I'm also finding hard to understand the reason for the thread model
documentation, i.e. how it connects to the implementation.
/Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-10 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 16:42 [PATCH] doc: trusted-encrypted: updates with TEE as a new trust source (update) Mimi Zohar
2020-12-11 8:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-11 15:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-04 12:36 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-10 3:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-12 5:25 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-13 21:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-15 23:15 ` Elaine Palmer
2021-01-18 6:53 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-20 14:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 14:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-04 12:15 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-10 3:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/pxC3vvGBsn1T09@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=erpalmer@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gcwilson@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=zgu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).