From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8356EC433E0 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E76664D9E for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344116AbhA0R7A (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:59:00 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49326 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344337AbhA0R6u (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:58:50 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C32CD64DA8; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:58:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1611770289; bh=+O3jKv8M1tmgM/F7PEyZuJWMLRlansLUD6rwtkOxk+8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rDrRWWM2FyhqJJ+5rL0A19E33uaWloPjv7Vz5pLdFG1MqYjBzvTtn1pzS4VMjIDkb mS+tUnm/J6B3YVxSt3anIfoTsOA43m0IklYGOrp/05OfnphGHdNXbAtoGmJoLY6gSe gYT7eOOBlYnQeNAjiu0yP1MYzBmtLBfGN3As6QEGt+0Nvy9h9UNyu0/G7RJd71tQky 4rQLFIks7JZmIBY5ky0cLzhy31lDoArfumDBVxII6nkAx0J7OELp8J9DBta2NbEEcq CRw8BAVADhVGtXbmlk7G2rCNN3HhRxpk+wIDUZE6hOqb90sNiwmcQ21kE+/R+46gJu Ny5h3uDGEVavQ== Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:58:05 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: "Tj (Elloe Linux)" , James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jsnitsel@redhat.com Subject: Re: Bug: TPM returned invalid status Message-ID: References: <374e918c-f167-9308-2bea-ae6bc6a3d2e3@elloe.vision> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <374e918c-f167-9308-2bea-ae6bc6a3d2e3@elloe.vision> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:00:54AM +0000, Tj (Elloe Linux) wrote: > Seeing this on Lenovo E495's that have: > > AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx > > Linux version 5.11.0-rc4+ (tj@elloe000) (gcc (Ubuntu > 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #12 > SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 24 11:28:01 GMT 2021 > Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.11.0-rc4+ > root=/dev/mapper/ELLOE000-rootfs ro acpi_osi=! "acpi_osi=Windows 2016" > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 nosplash > ... > efi: EFI v2.70 by Lenovo > > efi: ACPI=0xbddfd000 ACPI 2.0=0xbddfd014 TPMFinalLog=0xbdc2d000 > SMBIOS=0xba4d7000 SMBIOS 3.0=0xba4ca000 MEMATTR=0xb5611018 > ESRT=0xb9075000 RNG=0xba5c2598 TPMEventLog=0xb13ae > 018 > ... > DMI: LENOVO 20NECTO1WW/20NECTO1WW, BIOS R11ET32W (1.12 ) 12/23/2019 > ... > tpm_tis NTC0702:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFC, rev-id 1) > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > TPM returned invalid status > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:249 There's a patch set in cycle that should fix this: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201001180925.13808-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com/ James, where are we at with this? /Jarkko