From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F375C433DB for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF40A64DAC for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344092AbhA0SBn (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:01:43 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49872 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344044AbhA0SBm (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:01:42 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 980A564D9F; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:01:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1611770462; bh=xGl4uZ2Nns8KPP6oUyz4IEvH3y5nHbk3w/N8YVQTpD8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eofuoiAugH/V3hPx/Dgj3L2j0hQB/WxKakFubGJnBkS75h2j9PXHCTRY1GydF+gAV WwmK3nvmkmoSXJ098AYSqEhmBEJKaHAQjCQbf673G9syRqeTJRlEet30m7nBASm+vY fm42z1/55+jBQaf0iYlDwz5FsKD99EVFqZa5lKpDTUVVxrLZu5XS+qFCkouszHMv6/ AnPXaz3PI3jFUSok5kQLeQx29lvPSIKXob7eRXvZPThqQR4mq+Yjl/uJtXFZh4Lzhy tXiFQlp2PkcvDAIGjggKSFp9jkLaazTQhrGcFA3spe51VjLGrYXkSTREx2OkIX0rkq LrmfWSlH1eUyw== Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:00:58 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: "Tj (Elloe Linux)" , James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jsnitsel@redhat.com Subject: Re: Bug: TPM returned invalid status Message-ID: References: <374e918c-f167-9308-2bea-ae6bc6a3d2e3@elloe.vision> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 07:58:08PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:00:54AM +0000, Tj (Elloe Linux) wrote: > > Seeing this on Lenovo E495's that have: > > > > AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx > > > > Linux version 5.11.0-rc4+ (tj@elloe000) (gcc (Ubuntu > > 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #12 > > SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 24 11:28:01 GMT 2021 > > Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.11.0-rc4+ > > root=/dev/mapper/ELLOE000-rootfs ro acpi_osi=! "acpi_osi=Windows 2016" > > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 nosplash > > ... > > efi: EFI v2.70 by Lenovo > > > > efi: ACPI=0xbddfd000 ACPI 2.0=0xbddfd014 TPMFinalLog=0xbdc2d000 > > SMBIOS=0xba4d7000 SMBIOS 3.0=0xba4ca000 MEMATTR=0xb5611018 > > ESRT=0xb9075000 RNG=0xba5c2598 TPMEventLog=0xb13ae > > 018 > > ... > > DMI: LENOVO 20NECTO1WW/20NECTO1WW, BIOS R11ET32W (1.12 ) 12/23/2019 > > ... > > tpm_tis NTC0702:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFC, rev-id 1) > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > TPM returned invalid status > > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:249 > > There's a patch set in cycle that should fix this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201001180925.13808-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com/ > > James, where are we at with this? I'm interested because I'm yet to send my pr and this is generating constantly bug reports. /Jarkko