linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morris James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd updates for v5.12-rc1
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBfmP2qKmsFg4Tfj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9e8a184f482d7f826659427764a7612ab775c3e.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 09:33:47AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 19:15 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 07:38:21PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:54 PM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > This contains bug fixes for tpm_tis driver, which had a racy wait
> > > > for hardware state change to be ready to send a command to the
> > > > TPM chip. The bug has existed already since 2006, but has only
> > > > made itself known in recent past.
> > > 
> > > Hmm. Is this for the next merge window? The subject line implies
> > > that, as does the addition of the cr50 driver.
> > > 
> > > But the commentary about fixes implies that at least part of it
> > > should be in 5.11?
> > 
> > This was meant for 5.12 but the timing was *way* too early. I'll take
> > this one back. Just to unambiguity reasons I'll use tpmdd-next-v5.12-
> > rc1-v2 tag for my final v5.12 PR, once I send it.
> > 
> > I considered a bit, and I really think that it would make a lot of
> > sense to do a late 5.11 just containing the two commits from James,
> > namely:
> > 
> > 1. tpm_tis: Fix check_locality for correct locality acquisition
> > 2. tpm_tis: Clean up locality release 
> > 
> > James: Does this make sense to you? 
> 
> Yes, that's fine with me.  It will quiet the warning we've had several
> bug reports about, so it's definitely a bug fix.

Thanks, this is exactly what I wanted to sanity check. I figured that
those should be enough, but unfortunately I do not have any hardware
triggering the issue in my possession.

> James

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-29  0:54 [GIT PULL] tpmdd updates for v5.12-rc1 Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-29  3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-30 17:15   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-30 17:33     ` James Bottomley
2021-02-01 11:30       ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-01-30 18:44     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-02 15:15       ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YBfmP2qKmsFg4Tfj@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).