From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFF9C433FE for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234933AbhLUKsI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:48:08 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:45306 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234841AbhLUKsH (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:48:07 -0500 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCE41F388; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:48:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1640083686; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AbfCrwTcgXJNYxMWN99H4eXJ0A9mLBjD7Y9Uzue0Z+g=; b=pgxemyO4pXQGI6M4S5jNS8B5Ok4JZwefgkFlEyYw82QUuc+fFH1g/1/LbgAKCr7t+Q1Ypx RCaVDvS2ZlLgBNkVmQHjP1glK0nm80V1pzJqGUJ3pzedk2UjSqUe4dQaoS5j8HS4DfHtqQ P+nEDUTefVU0tcrLR+jjfiP7AZkMQnA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1640083686; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AbfCrwTcgXJNYxMWN99H4eXJ0A9mLBjD7Y9Uzue0Z+g=; b=DAr4EQNXoVKhGC1jQ9S3x94eg8Kb9hN+ciGFo2370AgAgutUzfrRVc4le4GZaxBgfAwl5i EUadzfpipKdZiGCA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6142213C26; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id +lGEFOawwWHmZwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:48:06 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:48:04 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Nageswara Sastry Cc: Yael Tiomkin , ltp@lists.linux.it, zohar@linux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys. Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20211221023721.129689-1-yaelt@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Hi Nageswara, > On 21/12/21 8:07 am, Yael Tiomkin wrote: > > Test that encrypted keys can be instantiated using > > both user-provided decrypted data > > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20211213192030.125091-1-yaelt@google.com/), > > or kernel-generated numbers. > > Signed-off-by: Yael Tiomkin > Tested on ppc64le platform I suppose it also fails on ppc64le when run more iterations. ./keyctl09 -i500 keyctl09.c:49: TPASS: Encrypted keys were successfully instantiated and read keyctl09.c:49: TPASS: Encrypted keys were successfully instantiated and read ... keyctl09.c:33: TFAIL: Failed to instantiate encrypted key using payload decrypted data (It's always good to put higher number iterations.) Kind regards, Petr