From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E9FC433EF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232880AbiCCMnP (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:43:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59308 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232696AbiCCMnO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:43:14 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E30DF6F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 04:42:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443EF21997; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:42:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1646311346; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xs8jqVpnxbRTelnhAQm950cFVdavmKGtU2ugu6BhiTQ=; b=ccNGzTnrtBlJQgSfv3AW2m3M4z4zX/cawYZ6YvRl+QDRJeInQe1YsU4PN9R7IG292fvbM0 Yj+wBbGw0Wq/ny97xZFuBVOJOGRJYafP/UwE/y7i+eLLyS2gvNjQVpKwv911KH02MZvWFB aQM2a1yoW3CY80tPrAKHGQMeAdVF81w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1646311346; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xs8jqVpnxbRTelnhAQm950cFVdavmKGtU2ugu6BhiTQ=; b=hGfFmfLq81JxbTFF93p3PT3YZW9IMiJ91SSQ+8PTpYCm3IaxOfEQoZsUKnbD1XniCBUh+X 11q0s8k6CDM8weAg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7D313C08; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id kWq6CrK3IGIsRQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 12:42:26 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:44:46 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Cc: Yael Tzur , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys with provided decrypted data. Message-ID: References: <20220223200731.1859670-1-yaelt@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > I this case I guess that in this case the change is so minimal that we > > can add this test into LTP once it reaches Linus tree. > Cyril, maybe we could finally merge our policy (waiting ack for you): > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20220203101803.10204-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com/ > and put keyctl09 into runtest/staging now. I guess that we still did not agree on exactly how this should be handled or did we? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz