From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com>
Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: trusted: Fix memory leak in tpm2_key_encode()
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:22:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqGDlYGGOvC8rkf6@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqGDTVa64aknbldb@iki.fi>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:21:20AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:17:32PM +0800, Jianglei Nie wrote:
> > tpm2_key_encode() allocates a memory chunk from scratch with kmalloc(),
> > but it is never freed, which leads to a memory leak. Free the memory
> > chunk with kfree() in the return path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com>
> > ---
>
> You should write down the changelog ere. No idea what changed
> from the previous version.
>
> > security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> > index 0165da386289..8b7ab22950d1 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > struct trusted_key_options *options,
> > u8 *src, u32 len)
> > {
> > + int err;
>
> Declare as the last local variable (reverse christmas tree order).
>
> Also, I'd use "int ret" since in other functions that is used.
>
> > const int SCRATCH_SIZE = PAGE_SIZE;
> > u8 *scratch = kmalloc(SCRATCH_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > u8 *work = scratch, *work1;
> > @@ -57,8 +58,10 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > unsigned char bool[3], *w = bool;
> > /* tag 0 is emptyAuth */
> > w = asn1_encode_boolean(w, w + sizeof(bool), true);
> > - if (WARN(IS_ERR(w), "BUG: Boolean failed to encode"))
> > - return PTR_ERR(w);
> > + if (WARN(IS_ERR(w), "BUG: Boolean failed to encode")) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(w);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > work = asn1_encode_tag(work, end_work, 0, bool, w - bool);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -69,8 +72,10 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > * trigger, so if it does there's something nefarious going on
> > */
> > if (WARN(work - scratch + pub_len + priv_len + 14 > SCRATCH_SIZE,
> > - "BUG: scratch buffer is too small"))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + "BUG: scratch buffer is too small")) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > work = asn1_encode_integer(work, end_work, options->keyhandle);
> > work = asn1_encode_octet_string(work, end_work, pub, pub_len);
> > @@ -79,10 +84,16 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload,
> > work1 = payload->blob;
> > work1 = asn1_encode_sequence(work1, work1 + sizeof(payload->blob),
> > scratch, work - scratch);
> > - if (WARN(IS_ERR(work1), "BUG: ASN.1 encoder failed"))
> > - return PTR_ERR(work1);
> > + if (WARN(IS_ERR(work1), "BUG: ASN.1 encoder failed")) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
>
> Why you are changing the return value from PTR_ERR(work1
> to -EINVAL?
>
> > + }
> > + kfree(scratch);
> >
> > return work1 - payload->blob;
> > +
> > +out:
>
> Nit:
>
> err:
>
> It's only used for the error path.
>
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > struct tpm2_key_context {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> BR, Jarkko
And the patch is also missing fixes tag:
Fixes: f2219745250f ("security: keys: trusted: use ASN.1 TPM2 key format for the blobs")
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-08 13:17 [PATCH v2] KEYS: trusted: Fix memory leak in tpm2_key_encode() Jianglei Nie
2022-06-08 13:38 ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-09 5:28 ` jarkko
2022-07-22 8:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Jianglei Nie
2022-07-28 8:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-06-09 5:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-06-09 5:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-08 14:35 Jianglei Nie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqGDlYGGOvC8rkf6@iki.fi \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niejianglei2021@163.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).