linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee: use send_recv() op
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:58:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-QkGUenPAMid63l@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z-QV5y1JGBDpsPuH@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1633 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:57:47PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:34:01AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 02:11:12PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > > Generally speaking I don't see enough value in complicating
> > > callback interface. It's better to handle complications in
> > > the leaves (i.e. dictatorship of majority ;-) ).
> > 
> > That is very much not the way most driver subsystems view the
> > world. We want to pull logical things into the core code and remove
> > them from drivers to make the drivers simpler and more robust.
> > 
> > The amount of really dumb driver boiler plate that this series
> > obviously removes is exactly the sort of stuff we should be fixing by
> > improving the core code.
> > 
> > The callback interface was never really sanely designed, it was just
> > built around the idea of pulling the timout processing into the core
> > code for TIS hardware. It should be revised to properly match these
> > new HW types that don't have this kind of timeout mechanism.
> 
> Both TIS and CRB, which are TCG standards and they span to many
> different types of drivers and busses. I don't have the figures but
> probably they cover vast majority of the hardware.
> 
> We are talking about 39 lines of reduced complexity at the cost
> of complicating branching at the top level. I doubt that there
> is either any throughput or latency issues.
> 
> What is measurable benefit? The rationale is way way too abstract
> for me to cope, sorry.

E.g., here's how you can get rid of extra cruft in tpm_ftpm_tee w/o
any new callbacks.

BR, Jarkko

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-tpm-Make-chip-status-cancel-req_canceled-opt.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3400 bytes --]

From 1125e80ea274a5ec5d5dba32bfce716ce62c5e4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:55:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Make chip->{status,cancel,req_canceled} opt

tpm_ftpm_tee does not require chip->status, chip->cancel and
chip->req_canceled. Make them optional.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c  | 18 ------------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
index f62f7871edbd..10ba47a882d8 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -58,6 +58,30 @@ unsigned long tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 ordinal)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_calc_ordinal_duration);
 
+static void tpm_chip_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+	if (!chip->ops->cancel)
+		return;
+
+	chip->ops->cancel(chip);
+}
+
+static u8 tpm_chip_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+	if (!chip->ops->status)
+		return 0;
+
+	return chip->ops->status(chip);
+}
+
+static bool tpm_chip_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status)
+{
+	if (!chip->ops->req_canceled)
+		return false;
+
+	return chip->ops->req_canceled(chip, status);
+}
+
 static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
 {
 	struct tpm_header *header = buf;
@@ -65,6 +89,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
 	ssize_t len = 0;
 	u32 count, ordinal;
 	unsigned long stop;
+	u8 status;
 
 	if (bufsiz < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -104,12 +129,12 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
 
 	stop = jiffies + tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
 	do {
-		u8 status = chip->ops->status(chip);
+		status = tpm_chip_status(chip);
 		if ((status & chip->ops->req_complete_mask) ==
 		    chip->ops->req_complete_val)
 			goto out_recv;
 
-		if (chip->ops->req_canceled(chip, status)) {
+		if (tpm_chip_req_canceled(chip, status)) {
 			dev_err(&chip->dev, "Operation Canceled\n");
 			return -ECANCELED;
 		}
@@ -118,7 +143,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
 		rmb();
 	} while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
 
-	chip->ops->cancel(chip);
+	tpm_chip_cancel(chip);
 	dev_err(&chip->dev, "Operation Timed out\n");
 	return -ETIME;
 
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c
index 8d9209dfc384..3732f3623537 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c
@@ -164,30 +164,12 @@ static int ftpm_tee_tpm_op_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ftpm_tee_tpm_op_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip)
-{
-	/* not supported */
-}
-
-static u8 ftpm_tee_tpm_op_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static bool ftpm_tee_tpm_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status)
-{
-	return false;
-}
-
 static const struct tpm_class_ops ftpm_tee_tpm_ops = {
 	.flags = TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP,
 	.recv = ftpm_tee_tpm_op_recv,
 	.send = ftpm_tee_tpm_op_send,
-	.cancel = ftpm_tee_tpm_op_cancel,
-	.status = ftpm_tee_tpm_op_status,
 	.req_complete_mask = 0,
 	.req_complete_val = 0,
-	.req_canceled = ftpm_tee_tpm_req_canceled,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.39.5


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-26 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-20 15:24 [PATCH 0/2] tpm: add send_recv() op and use it in tpm_ftpm_tee driver Stefano Garzarella
2025-03-20 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: add send_recv() op in tpm_class_ops Stefano Garzarella
2025-03-26 16:53   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-27  9:48     ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-03-27 13:02       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-27 14:44         ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-03-20 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee: use send_recv() op Stefano Garzarella
2025-03-25  5:19   ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-26 12:11     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-26 14:34       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-03-26 14:57         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-26 15:58           ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-03-26 20:37             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-27  9:27               ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-03-27 13:04                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-QkGUenPAMid63l@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).