From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout2.hostsharing.net (bmailout2.hostsharing.net [83.223.78.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1329E1865; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.223.78.240 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713004492; cv=none; b=hAudXMwf4jwcj7CsSTWd00l6AmN8Sx5yYNh4gj+4UmX1mE+t0C/DMO9UnDNut8WbK5kf7iSYAGiOcRPyxSCEsFD9Vn2A7aQusZgKxStYzij0SidOM+VEbCTjFHKX1EwtLfFL4IcLY95H+9DsMJ+n+dNt9KWVvzWJMYOGp89wY2s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713004492; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GgoGL2xBNyIzinXiTS9nqnjjz5JkJhr64vtoDo3KiwE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u2krzIxKHWzUaxeBktJOBTbQRRR7NtQv759AJATUTbFP2cWVm4YeY4ce//aA5uRCarC4t1HR28sKe8Xxb/ql6z/SVNsAwIkpb03h0d5+BntLzAoqSGYwBzN5/DrraYEnlcCww9DY/2aryykdN0m9QTbwWo663pVnwqbMgCGV8xM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.223.78.240 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [IPv6:2a01:37:1000::53df:5f1c:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by bmailout2.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1025280253E0; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:34:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id CC14B2482; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:34:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:34:41 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: "M. Haener" , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alexander Sverdlin Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS binding Message-ID: References: <20240413071621.12509-1-michael.haener@siemens.com> <20240413071621.12509-3-michael.haener@siemens.com> <8c13a349-a721-44d3-9e23-2e01f4c2ca4d@linaro.org> <3d08cf54-f58f-446f-977e-21ba65986924@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3d08cf54-f58f-446f-977e-21ba65986924@linaro.org> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:23:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/04/2024 12:18, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need > > > second patch? Plus binding come before users. > > > > Right, the order of the patches needs to be reversed it seems. > > What is the second patch? Device is or is not compatible? The other patch just adds an entry to of_tis_i2c_match[] in the driver, pretty unspectacular: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240413071621.12509-2-michael.haener@siemens.com/ Unfortunately it was only cc'ed to TPM driver maintainers.