From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD90190696; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747845722; cv=none; b=UNubZer1SNHAK9xv1xFvq/mUd2B7XoToG4M26BdtTjbeKP+SaWsFkElsHROopZx8DSWWTE62pSFzYwDfEg6SYuZKvPL20311FQnYbUz/T1nuUlKHqvQ3ctdcyy0gkO+9xUaEprqkxjBAdyrVR7YXfGGrS5c6RbkFXH1V4OlaM4o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747845722; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fNlJI98IRmJku5DUDB7KU0NTAR5l/AoBK5dNhkMKy3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fGyK0AXacsYYpe9feDCBf1qXQk28fr5WqLGVHe8QMWEi8Vmg5+gPix/M1+l5UrteXCmCN2LP2yhgQc+xeOQ/kx1tEMQ9Cu7yzcKTeuoX0V5o7i6bg76Nyf0tMnRRXOo6VaaLGudLnLO6s4QCKHEfw30sSAZQAn0tbAD1U0KgiV8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=W5UxbfYH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="W5UxbfYH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C091C4CEE4; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:42:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747845721; bh=fNlJI98IRmJku5DUDB7KU0NTAR5l/AoBK5dNhkMKy3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W5UxbfYHZeoYDuN5ngewjlWzVx7fvv+BRtndc80ovjhiG8g1I0PHO5ybTj6Lu6x7z g36JHRBWYtNWkCBo4PMkcy0oVlBeyMphixat7L/44FREl/Q339WNexmioK64JLpHrr ovP+rgZvQ9g6LwFcH/HDCu9vpS3tLCd/GJAcQWnttlw4kKAxt0ie+p9RLIYWYKjjhH 93rSYCm1Z1xfN5fXmFJkD1WSt0TC4uayOcstPRMB2i+aKB06sSd7LdyWxS+W5yFd8X bdNdzs+Y/THmEK3YDLZn9UkbD1V8YTXfyH5h5kHwmICgedMJsRAjUNUWn2aXZj8rj/ RKYVBmYwmsZHw== Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 19:41:57 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Huewe , Jens Wiklander , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , Nicholas Piggin , Sumit Garg , James Bottomley , Claudiu Beznea , Madhavan Srinivasan , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christophe Leroy , Naveen N Rao , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tpm/tpm_svsm: support TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC Message-ID: References: <20250514134630.137621-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <20250514134630.137621-5-sgarzare@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 01:12:20PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > I tried, but the last patch (this one) is based on the series merged > > on the tip tree, where I introduced tpm_svsm. > > I can see that series in linux-next merged with commit > > 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07, > > but I can't see it in your next tree [1]. > > > > How do we proceed in such cases? > > > > Just to be sure, did I use the right tree? > > Thanks for the remark. Lemme check tonight. Hold on doing > anything ;-) We'll get there... I just rebased my branches on top of latest from Linus. That is what I need base PR also on, and: $ git show 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07 fatal: bad object 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07 I'd use git cherry-pick on a range to take them from linux-next to a mainline tip... BR, Jarkko