public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
	Steven Chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] kernel/kexec: Fix IMA when allocation happens in CMA area
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 17:31:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ28dGVP4UqsoIzI@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQ21GVR1pEjzWvw1@fedora>

On 11/07/25 at 05:00pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 01:25:41PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 11/07/25 at 01:13pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 9:51 AM Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 11/06/25 at 06:01pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 4:01 PM Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/06/25 at 02:59pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > > > > > When I tested kexec with the latest kernel, I ran into the following warning:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [   40.712410] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > > > [   40.712576] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1562 at kernel/kexec_core.c:1001 kimage_map_segment+0x144/0x198
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > [   40.816047] Call trace:
> > > > > > > [   40.818498]  kimage_map_segment+0x144/0x198 (P)
> > > > > > > [   40.823221]  ima_kexec_post_load+0x58/0xc0
> > > > > > > [   40.827246]  __do_sys_kexec_file_load+0x29c/0x368
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > [   40.855423] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is caused by the fact that kexec allocates the destination directly
> > > > > > > in the CMA area. In that case, the CMA kernel address should be exported
> > > > > > > directly to the IMA component, instead of using the vmalloc'd address.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, you didn't update the log accordingly.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean the earlier content which I
> > > > > replied to you?
> > > >
> > > > No. In v1, you return cma directly. But in v2, you return its direct
> > > > mapping address, isnt' it?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Yes. But I think it is a fault in the code, which does not convey the
> > > expression in the commit log. Do you think I should rephrase the words
> > > "the CMA kernel address" as "the CMA kernel direct mapping address"?
> > 
> > That's fine to me.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know why cma area can't be mapped into vmalloc?
> > > > > >
> > > > > Should not the kernel direct mapping be used?
> > > >
> > > > When image->segment_cma[i] has value, image->ima_buffer_addr also
> > > > contains the physical address of the cma area, why cma physical address
> > > > can't be mapped into vmalloc and cause the failure and call trace?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > It could be done using the vmalloc approach, but it's unnecessary.
> > > IIUC, kimage_map_segment() was introduced to provide a contiguous
> > > virtual address for IMA access, since the IND_SRC pages are scattered
> > > throughout the kernel. However, in the CMA case, there is already a
> > > contiguous virtual address in the kernel direct mapping range.
> > > Normally, when we have a physical address, we simply use
> > > phys_to_virt() to get its corresponding kernel virtual address.
> > 
> > OK, I understand cma area is contiguous, and no need to map into
> > vmalloc. I am wondering why in the old code mapping cma addrss into 
> > vmalloc cause the warning which you said is a IMA problem. 
> > 
> 
> It doesn't go that far. The old code doesn't map CMA into vmalloc'd
> area.
> 
> void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image, int idx)
> {
> 	...
>         for_each_kimage_entry(image, ptr, entry) {
>                 if (entry & IND_DESTINATION) {
>                         dest_page_addr = entry & PAGE_MASK;
>                 } else if (entry & IND_SOURCE) {
>                         if (dest_page_addr >= addr && dest_page_addr < eaddr) {
>                                 src_page_addr = entry & PAGE_MASK;
>                                 src_pages[i++] =
>                                         virt_to_page(__va(src_page_addr));
>                                 if (i == npages)
>                                         break;
>                                 dest_page_addr += PAGE_SIZE;
>                         }
>                 }
>         }
> 
>         /* Sanity check. */
>         WARN_ON(i < npages);     //--> This is the warning thrown by kernel
> 
>         vaddr = vmap(src_pages, npages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>         kfree(src_pages);
> 
>         if (!vaddr)
>                 pr_err("Could not map ima buffer.\n");
> 
>         return vaddr;
> }
> 
> When CMA is used, there is no IND_SOURCE, so we have i=0 < npages.
> Now, I see how my words ("In that case, the CMA kernel address should be
> exported directly to the IMA component, instead of using the vmalloc'd
> address.") confused you. As for "instead of using the vmalloc'd
> address", I meant to mention "vmap()" approach.

Ok, I got it. It's truly a bug because if image->segment_cma[idx] is
valid, the current kimage_map_segment() can't collect the source pages
at all since they are not marked with IND_DESTINATION|IND_SOURCE as
normal segment does. In that situation, we can take the direct mapping
address of image->segment_cma[idx] which is more efficient, instead of
collecting source pages and vmap().


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-06  6:59 [PATCHv2 1/2] kernel/kexec: Change the prototype of kimage_map_segment() Pingfan Liu
2025-11-06  6:59 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] kernel/kexec: Fix IMA when allocation happens in CMA area Pingfan Liu
2025-11-06  8:01   ` Baoquan He
2025-11-06 10:01     ` Pingfan Liu
2025-11-07  1:51       ` Baoquan He
2025-11-07  5:13         ` Pingfan Liu
2025-11-07  5:25           ` Baoquan He
2025-11-07  9:00             ` Pingfan Liu
2025-11-07  9:31               ` Baoquan He [this message]
2025-11-07  9:34   ` Baoquan He
2025-11-24 22:16 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] kernel/kexec: Change the prototype of kimage_map_segment() Andrew Morton
2025-11-25  4:10   ` Pingfan Liu
2025-11-25  4:54   ` Baoquan He
2025-11-25 17:55     ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-26  1:10 ` Baoquan He
2025-11-26  1:53   ` Baoquan He
2025-11-26  2:30     ` Pingfan Liu
2025-11-26  4:47   ` Pingfan Liu
2025-12-03  4:22   ` Pingfan Liu
2025-12-03  8:06     ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQ28dGVP4UqsoIzI@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chenste@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox