From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tpm_crb: Convert ACPI driver to a platform one
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 23:47:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aadW1RVnBikOy5Q7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2706178.Lt9SDvczpP@rafael.j.wysocki>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
> to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
> the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
> underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
> used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
> why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
>
> Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
> ACPI companions, so convert the tpm_crb ACPI driver to a platform one.
>
> While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
> layout and so it will be visible to user space.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index 6c25305c256e..7d1377e8e616 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> #include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> @@ -602,13 +603,13 @@ static u64 crb_fixup_cmd_size(struct device *dev, struct resource *io_res,
> return io_res->end - start + 1;
> }
>
> -static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> +static int crb_map_io(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv,
> struct acpi_table_tpm2 *buf)
> {
> + struct acpi_device *device = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> struct list_head acpi_resource_list;
> struct resource iores_array[TPM_CRB_MAX_RESOURCES + 1] = { {0} };
> void __iomem *iobase_array[TPM_CRB_MAX_RESOURCES] = {NULL};
> - struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> struct resource *iores;
> void __iomem **iobase_ptr;
> int i;
> @@ -782,12 +783,13 @@ static int crb_map_pluton(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static int crb_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct acpi_device *device = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> struct acpi_table_tpm2 *buf;
> struct crb_priv *priv;
> struct tpm_chip *chip;
> - struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> struct tpm2_crb_smc *crb_smc;
> struct tpm2_crb_ffa *crb_ffa;
> struct tpm2_crb_pluton *crb_pluton;
> @@ -867,7 +869,7 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> priv->sm = sm;
> priv->hid = acpi_device_hid(device);
>
> - rc = crb_map_io(device, priv, buf);
> + rc = crb_map_io(dev, priv, buf);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -901,12 +903,9 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static void crb_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static void crb_acpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> - struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -
> - tpm_chip_unregister(chip);
> + tpm_chip_unregister(platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
> }
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops crb_pm = {
> @@ -919,19 +918,17 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id crb_device_ids[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, crb_device_ids);
>
> -static struct acpi_driver crb_acpi_driver = {
> - .name = "tpm_crb",
> - .ids = crb_device_ids,
> - .ops = {
> - .add = crb_acpi_add,
> - .remove = crb_acpi_remove,
> - },
> - .drv = {
> +static struct platform_driver crb_acpi_driver = {
> + .probe = crb_acpi_probe,
> + .remove = crb_acpi_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "tpm_crb_acpi",
> + .acpi_match_table = crb_device_ids,
> .pm = &crb_pm,
> },
> };
>
> -module_acpi_driver(crb_acpi_driver);
> +module_platform_driver(crb_acpi_driver);
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPM2 Driver");
> MODULE_VERSION("0.1");
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
>
>
Yep, historical relic, thank you.
Applied.
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
BR, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 15:55 [PATCH v1] tpm_crb: Convert ACPI driver to a platform one Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-03 21:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aadW1RVnBikOy5Q7@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox