From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
eric.snowberg@oracle.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, noodles@fb.com,
bauermann@kolabnow.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: code@tyhicks.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] ima: configure memory to log events between kexec load and execute
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:52:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af09bb62-a637-4e30-884a-9ce1a5bf030c@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7c5feb3-b9ef-45c1-bd1c-2bf0e4b7d0c5@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/11/24 11:20, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/24 13:13, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/7/24 09:00, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 12:20 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>>>>>> b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>>>>>> index 60a511c6b583..8792b7aab768 100644
>>>>>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -338,3 +338,12 @@ config IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE
>>>>>> default n
>>>>>> help
>>>>>> This option disables htable to allow measurement of
>>>>>> duplicate records.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB
>>>>>> + int
>>>>>> + depends on IMA && IMA_KEXEC
>>>>>> + default 64
>>>>>
>>>>> Since this isn't optional, the default should remain as a half page.
>>>>> Since a page is architecture specific, the default will need to be
>>>>> arch
>>>>> specific
>>>>>
>>>> It was a feedback from Stefan in the V2 of this series to convert it
>>>> from number of PAGES to KB.[1]
>>>>
>>>> But I can revert it to number of pages again.
>>>>
>>>> Also, making the default value as a fraction (1/2 page) feels weird for
>>>> a CONFIG variable.
>>>>
>>>> Is it ok to make the default value as one page rather than half page?
>>>
>>> The point is not whether the extra memory is specified in terms of
>>> pages or KB.
>>> For backwards compatibility the existing default should be the same as
>>> previously. This means the default needs to be architecture specific.b
>>> $ uname -m; getconf PAGESIZE
>>> x86_64
>>> 4096
>>> $ uname -m; getconf PAGESIZE
>>> ppc64le
>>> 65536
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> default 32 if PPC_64K_PAGES
>>> default 2
>>>
>> Ok. Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>>
>> Do we want to support only 64K or 4K as possible PAGE_SIZE values?
>> I spot checked a few architectures, there are scenarios where PAGE_SIZE
>> could be 8K, 16K, 128K, 256K etc. And of course mega pages with
>> PAGE_SIZE IN MBs (details below).
>
> I would let the user specify the number of kilobytes to reserve and from
> this you can conclude the page numbers:
>
> needed_pages = KBs_TO_RESERVE / PAGE_SIZE
> if (KBs_TO_RESERVER % PAGE_SIZE)
> needed_pages++;
>
> Stefan
Thanks Stefan.
But the issue here is about the default value,
not the user specified value.
Mimi is suggesting to keep the default value half-a-page,
to maintain backwards compatibility.
If we go with the KBs approach -
half-a-page translates to different KBs on different architectures.
And setting the right default value in KBs which would translate to
the desired half-a-page, on a given arch, inside the Kconfig seems
fragile (as I mentioned in the context of Option A in my previous
response.
And if we go with num_pages approach -
putting a fractional value (0.5) as a default in Kconfig seems to be non
trivial too.
Translating num_pages to KBs is trivial in code, but I think its
orthogonal to this conversation, since its about setting the desired
arch specific default value in Kconfig.
Option A:
---------
config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB
int
depends on IMA && IMA_KEXEC
default 128 if PAGE_SIZE_256KB
default 32 if PPC_64K_PAGES || PAGE_SIZE_64KB || PARISC_PAGE_SIZE_16KB
default 16 if PAGE_SIZE_32KB
default 8 if PAGE_SIZE_16KB || ARC_PAGE_SIZE_16K ||
PARISC_PAGE_SIZE_16KB
default 4 if PAGE_SIZE_8KB || ARC_PAGE_SIZE_8K
default 2
IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB determines the number of extra
memory (in KB) to be allocated for IMA measurements added
during kexec soft-reboot.
Option B:
--------
config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES
int
depends on IMA && IMA_KEXEC
default 1
help
IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_PAGES determines the number of extra
pages to be allocated for IMA measurements added during
kexec soft-reboot.
~Tushar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-16 1:07 [PATCH v3 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ima: define and call ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-20 16:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-05 19:47 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] ima: kexec: move ima log copy from kexec load to execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-20 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-11 23:29 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2024-01-12 17:06 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-12 17:26 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ima: kexec: map IMA buffer source pages to image after kexec load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] kexec: update kexec_file_load syscall to alloc ima buffer after load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ima: suspend measurements during buffer copy at kexec execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-20 20:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-05 19:50 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2024-01-11 17:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-11 18:17 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] ima: configure memory to log events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-20 20:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-05 20:20 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2024-01-07 17:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-11 18:13 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2024-01-11 19:20 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-11 20:52 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2024-01-12 17:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-12 18:23 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-16 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] ima: measure kexec load and exec events as critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2023-12-20 20:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-05 20:22 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2024-01-07 14:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-11 17:56 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af09bb62-a637-4e30-884a-9ce1a5bf030c@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox