From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] tpm_crb: Split start method into a separate header
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 02:17:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag-Sj3sUfkBXP4Eu@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518151724.730443-3-armenon@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 08:47:20PM +0530, Arun Menon wrote:
> From: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
>
> The current implementation handles different platform start methods
> (ACPI, ARM SMC, and ARM FFA) directly within crb_send().
> Move this logic into a new helper function, tpm_crb_start(). This is a
> pure refactor with no functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index d76f9e30f036..9a2f512b4ae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,32 @@ static int tpm_crb_smc_start(struct device *dev, unsigned long func_id)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static int tpm_crb_start(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> +{
> + struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> + int rc = 0;
> + /* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
> + * report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
> + * CRB start, hence invoking CRB start method if hid == MSFT0101.
> + */
> + if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER ||
> + priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
> + !strcmp(priv->hid, "MSFT0101"))
> + iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> + if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
> + priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
> + rc = crb_do_acpi_start(chip);
> + if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC) {
> + iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> + rc = tpm_crb_smc_start(&chip->dev, priv->smc_func_id);
> + }
> + if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_CRB_WITH_ARM_FFA) {
> + iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> + rc = tpm_crb_ffa_start(CRB_FFA_START_TYPE_COMMAND, chip->locality);
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> {
> struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> @@ -471,29 +497,7 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
> /* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
> wmb();
>
> - /* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
> - * report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
> - * CRB start, hence invoking CRB start method if hid == MSFT0101.
> - */
> - if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER ||
> - priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
> - !strcmp(priv->hid, "MSFT0101"))
> - iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> -
> - if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
> - priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
> - rc = crb_do_acpi_start(chip);
> -
> - if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC) {
> - iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> - rc = tpm_crb_smc_start(&chip->dev, priv->smc_func_id);
> - }
> -
> - if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_CRB_WITH_ARM_FFA) {
> - iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> - rc = tpm_crb_ffa_start(CRB_FFA_START_TYPE_COMMAND, chip->locality);
> - }
> -
> + rc = tpm_crb_start(chip);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 15:17 [PATCH v3 0/6] tpm_crb: Add command and response buffer chunking support Arun Menon
2026-05-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] tpm_crb: Add register definitions of TPM CRB chunking fields Arun Menon
2026-05-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] tpm_crb: Split start method into a separate header Arun Menon
2026-05-21 23:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-05-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] tpm_crb: Add start_cmd parameter to tpm_crb_start wrapper Arun Menon
2026-05-21 22:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] tpm: tis_i2c: Use local 4KB buffer to limit memory usage Arun Menon
2026-05-21 23:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] tpm: Increase TPM_BUFSIZE to 8kB for chunking support Arun Menon
2026-05-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic Arun Menon
2026-05-21 23:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-21 21:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] tpm_crb: Add command and response buffer chunking support Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag-Sj3sUfkBXP4Eu@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=armenon@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox