From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
noodles@fb.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: cap tpm_buf_append() at TPM_BUFSIZE, not PAGE_SIZE
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 02:24:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahOItgfj4k-NLAPa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260524-tpm-v1-1-2420a5977da6@debian.org>
On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 10:01:17AM -0400, Breno Leitao wrote:
> tpm_buf_append() guards against overflow of the underlying buffer by
> comparing the running length against PAGE_SIZE. Every other site in the
> TPM core uses TPM_BUFSIZE (4096) as the protocol-level cap on TPM
> command and response sizes.
>
> On 4K-page kernels PAGE_SIZE == TPM_BUFSIZE, so the two caps coincide
> and the inconsistency is invisible. On kernels with a larger base page
> size, e.g. CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y or 16K pages, PAGE_SIZE exceeds
> TPM_BUFSIZE.
>
> This is a latent bug rather than user-visible bug, given most of the
> cases PAGE_SIZE = 4096. The mismatch is still worth fixing because
> future callers (e.g. the proposed TPM_BUFSIZE increase to 8 KiB, and the
> Secure Launch tpm_buf rework) rely on the overflow flag being
> authoritative.
>
> Use TPM_BUFSIZE instead of PAGE_SIZE so the append-time check
> matches the transmit-time cap on every page size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Fixes: a74f8b36352e ("tpm: introduce tpm_buf")
> ---
There is no bug w/o a sympton of some sort. Not sure what the problem is here.
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c
> index dc882fc9fa9e..8da5de0f7159 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/tpm.h>
>
> +#include "tpm.h"
> +
> /**
> * tpm_buf_init() - Allocate and initialize a TPM command
> * @buf: A &tpm_buf
> @@ -108,7 +110,7 @@ void tpm_buf_append(struct tpm_buf *buf, const u8 *new_data, u16 new_length)
> if (buf->flags & TPM_BUF_OVERFLOW)
> return;
>
> - if ((buf->length + new_length) > PAGE_SIZE) {
> + if ((buf->length + new_length) > TPM_BUFSIZE) {
> WARN(1, "tpm_buf: write overflow\n");
> buf->flags |= TPM_BUF_OVERFLOW;
> return;
>
> ---
> base-commit: c1ecb239fa3456529a32255359fc78b69eb9d847
> change-id: 20260524-tpm-402b8478fec9
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-24 14:01 [PATCH] tpm: cap tpm_buf_append() at TPM_BUFSIZE, not PAGE_SIZE Breno Leitao
2026-05-24 23:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-05-26 18:20 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahOItgfj4k-NLAPa@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox