Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] tpm: tpm_crb_ffa: revert defered_probed when tpm_crb_ffa is built-in

[Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>]

On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 08:54:04AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> commit 746d9e9f62a6 ("tpm: tpm_crb_ffa: try to probe tpm_crb_ffa when it's build_in")
> probe tpm_crb_ffa forcefully when it's built-in to integrate with IMA.
> 
> However, IMA now provides the IMA_INIT_LATE_SYNC build option, which
> initialises IMA at the late_initcall_sync level, so this change is no
> longer required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c | 18 +++---------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c
> index 99f1c1e5644b..025c4d4b17ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c
> @@ -177,23 +177,13 @@ static int tpm_crb_ffa_to_linux_errno(int errno)
>   */
>  int tpm_crb_ffa_init(void)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	if (!IS_MODULE(CONFIG_TCG_ARM_CRB_FFA)) {
> -		ret = ffa_register(&tpm_crb_ffa_driver);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			tpm_crb_ffa = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
>  	if (!tpm_crb_ffa)
> -		ret = -ENOENT;
> +		return -ENOENT;
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(tpm_crb_ffa))
> -		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_crb_ffa_init);
>  
> @@ -405,9 +395,7 @@ static struct ffa_driver tpm_crb_ffa_driver = {
>  	.id_table = tpm_crb_ffa_device_id,
>  };
>  
> -#ifdef MODULE
>  module_ffa_driver(tpm_crb_ffa_driver);
> -#endif
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Arm");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPM CRB FFA driver");
> -- 
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
> 

How we would sync up this patch? Through which tree etc.


BR, Jarkko