From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D72A3B05B4; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787146598; cv=none; b=sFi4fB7jvMEXy6jEpV1aWpaz0UBFFeu2aBkKDZKaST9whCF0dphiU6BW3aUIyZn3eWhjbi+bMeUAJEeXRXXV3hrw9mLJkEVybYs0fNfODqy/Iixs+rZ1/0q2N32+EOnIxGzmxYs8kqJtMPrhMhFhm+67k6+jlkyAnygYp7AnJJc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787146598; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I9mLhMJ8owyNKD5c0C9jUzDrNUbpaeN13kKnb2UbGMc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IjEbLMpPzpE+kItcwfBNJ9Qy9Wm4o8QOqfAUSMBtnlSWIVknkFDlI+Zbzlzr73EUji2qO0BC614A4TMZxBMvTWPVM8q08UpQQxZJ6mUQFeBxcgSvFFPjvPIrXAXsNmooqV+DzV01FH8W7oX6/+qbtTx1b5hAbhbULcBLXRBVFGk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XK4YF4hi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XK4YF4hi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1787146596; x=1818682596; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=I9mLhMJ8owyNKD5c0C9jUzDrNUbpaeN13kKnb2UbGMc=; b=XK4YF4hi5j9fskcsIIXTVKTnl5W3TYPs9ymXP7gbOC4Gy9iA+JwpAJs7 KN3nhU3/zakNv1prcNgDKEu6RcPFe+tHFRguESnvGJTmg4AzaPyRqNfmH SRCbaoZeejsu7g6SokOPo8AWjcV5/A1jFHyMLcWxeTbU1gwHbtJSVlisl vCS1oxtzG0r+RkPhE2PQ4FH8Ceg+cKamq2eS8v42LY/Qkmwi5VL4yFIyf GkIFGd9nxFhMhqM8RjWHw0g+jxuPKJvB4MYO6PZm/w+PFNtyFRSurDEPz wpozF/nQY95JiRKuQVR/z0sojethn17cWwX7RzZ0G3rr3iEejoIy0RiUg Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W2OzQu1hTNa1LUTOc000HQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kz2FZzGOTbKjdK5vP9Olgw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11880"; a="87578542" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,231,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="87578542" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2026 06:36:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AA/eEztlQ3i33akx06r5hQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: M8ZoZi+8RTa6vOug68psdA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,231,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="263811465" Received: from amilburn-desk.amilburn-desk (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.106]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2026 06:36:33 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:36:30 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Linux ACPI , LKML , Mika Westerberg , Julien , jarkko@kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: scan: Avoid registering platform devices with resource overlaps Message-ID: References: <12955541.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki> <20260819003752.GA3063251@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 12:35:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 9:46 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 05:37:52PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: ... > > Does anything stop working? > > Apparently, a driver is not probing any more ... Yes, but it might be (however quite unlikely) the new message of the same state of affairs (for example, driver wasn't probed, but silently). Nevertheless, I assume that this driver is kinda critical and this is not just a message. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko